CFD for Underhood Modeling. Development of an Efficient Method

Examensarbete för masterexamen

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12380/204821
Download file(s):
File Description SizeFormat 
204821.pdfFulltext23.15 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLjungskog, Emil
dc.contributor.authorNilsson, Ulf
dc.contributor.departmentChalmers tekniska högskola / Institutionen för tillämpad mekaniksv
dc.contributor.departmentChalmers University of Technology / Department of Applied Mechanicsen
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-03T13:32:37Z-
dc.date.available2019-07-03T13:32:37Z-
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12380/204821-
dc.description.abstractToday's development of cooling systems for passenger cars relies on one-dimensional system simulations, which are heavily dependent on accurate input data obtained from testing or from CFD. Current three-dimensional CFD methods are deemed too computational and workload expensive to be used, which is why the present work was aimed at investigating the possibilities to develop a CFD model of the complete underhood compartment, with a high degree of automation. In the present work, two methods for CFD analysis of underhood flow in passenger cars were developed and compared. Both methods used ANSA for geometry cleanup and STAR-CCM+ as CFD solver, while the volume meshing differed. Method A used a polyhedral mesh created in STAR-CCM+, while a hexahedral mesh was used in method B. Surface wrapping was extensively used in both methods to reduce the manual workload in the geometry cleanup step. In order to validate the methods, they were both applied to a validation case. Both methods underestimated the heat rejection in the radiator with approximately 13% compared to wind tunnel measurements, while the heat rejection in the Charge Air Cooler was underestimated by 4:5% and 6:0% in method A and B, respectively. However, there was a large uncertainty in the experimental results, why further research will be needed to determine the validity of the developed methods. It was concluded that method A showed a larger potential to be used in production cases due to its lower time consumption and superior convergence behavior, even though more work is needed before it can be fully incorporated into the work flow. The time reduction compared to similar methods currently in use at Volvo cars was estimated to roughly 30 %.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiploma work - Department of Applied Mechanics, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden : 2014:37
dc.setspec.uppsokTechnology
dc.subjectStrömningsmekanik och akustik
dc.subjectHållbar utveckling
dc.subjectEnergi
dc.subjectTransport
dc.subjectFluid Mechanics and Acoustics
dc.subjectSustainable Development
dc.subjectEnergy
dc.subjectTransport
dc.titleCFD for Underhood Modeling. Development of an Efficient Method
dc.type.degreeExamensarbete för masterexamensv
dc.type.degreeMaster Thesisen
dc.type.uppsokH
Collection:Examensarbeten för masterexamen // Master Theses



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.