Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Division of Construction Management CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Gothenburg, Sweden 2015 Master’s Thesis 2015:72                                                       Internationalization a competitive advantage for SMEs? Review of the internationalization process set- up, and what are the motives for small to medium sized enterprises Master’s Thesis in the Master’s Programme International project management   Ellen Jacobsson       MASTER’S THESIS 2015:72 Internationalization a competitive advantage for SMEs? Review of the internationalization process set-up, and what are the motives for small to medium sized enterprises Master’s Thesis in the Master’s Programme International project management Ellen Jacobsson                                                       Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Division Construction Management CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Göteborg, Sweden 2015           I   Internationalization a competetive advantage for SMEs? Review of the internationalization process set-up, and what are the motives for small to medium sized enterprises Master’s Thesis in the Master’s Programme International project management Ellen Jacobsson © Ellen Jacobsson 2015   Examensarbete 2015:72/ Institutionen för bygg- och miljöteknik, Chalmers tekniska högskola 2015   Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Division of Construction Management Chalmers University of Technology SE-412 96 Göteborg Sweden Telephone: + 46 (0)31-772 1000 Cover: Chalmers Reproservice’ Göteborg, Sweden, 2015           I   Internationalization a competitive advantage for SMEs? Review of the internationalization process set-up, and what are the motives for small to medium sized enterprises Master’s thesis in the Master’s Programme International project management Ellen Jacobsson Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Division of Construction Management Chalmers University of Technology ABSTRACT Internationalization or offshoring is becoming a more commonly used strategy within the business environment today, but does this adapt to the construction industry. There are a number of larger construction companies that already are active on the international market, but how is it for small to medium sized enterprises, SMEs. The purpose of this thesis is to investigate whether or not internationalization for SMEs can be a competitive advantage, as well as illustrate different ways to set up an internationalization process. The thesis is based on a qualitative research approach where a number of semi- structure interviews have been conducted as the main data collection source. The interviews were conducted with three different companies, where two of them are SMEs and are working with innovative internationalization and the third one is a larger international company that perform strategic offshoring processes. The theoretical framework highlights that a clear strategy is needed to successfully perform an internationalization process. The empirical findings identify that the SMEs did not have any clear goal or strategy before approaching the Chinese market and therefore a lot of unnecessary risks were faced in the processes. This is the main reason why they still have not met a return on investment. For the larger firm the managers have a clear strategy for how the projects should be performed and therefore the company has met its expected goal. As the business environment looks like today within Gothenburg, the need to search for new market shares are minor and consequently the incentives for internationalization are small. An internationalization processes is relatively costly, hence it is of most importance to put up a clear strategy before entering a new market to be aware of the cost as a whole and the potential risks. Key words: Offshoring, Internationalization SMEs   CHALMERS,  Civil  and  Environmental  Engineering,  Master’s  Thesis  2015:72   II Contents ABSTRACT I   CONTENTS II   ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS IV   1   INTRODUCTION 1   1.1   Research question 2   1.2   Research aim and objectives 3   1.3   Research method 3   1.4   Scope and limitations 3   1.5   Dissertation structure 3   2   THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK 5   2.1   Internationalization process 5   2.1.1   Internationalization strategies 6   2.2   Offshoring engineering 7   2.3   Drivers and motivations in the internationalization process and offshoring strategy 8   2.3.1   Cost reduction 9   2.3.2   Resource seeking 10   2.4   Barriers and obstacles in the internationalization process and offshoring strategy 10   2.4.1   Internal barriers 11   2.4.2   External barriers 12   2.5   Decision processes in the internationalization and offshoring processes for SMEs 13   2.5.1   Decision processes 13   2.6   Summary of theoretical framework 14   3   METHODOLOGY 16   3.1   Research approach 16   3.1.1   Quantitative or Qualitative research 16   3.1.2   Trustworthiness 17   3.2   Development of theoretical framework 17   3.3   Data collection 18   3.4   Respondents 18   3.5   Interview 18   3.6   Data analysis 19         CHALMERS  Civil and Environmental Engineering, Master’s Thesis 2015:72 III   4   EMPIRICAL DATA 21   4.1   Company A 21   4.1.1   How do they work international? 21   4.1.2   Obstacles and Barriers 22   4.1.3   Opportunities 23   4.1.4   Financial 24   4.2   Company B 24   4.2.1   How do they work international? 25   4.2.2   Obstacles and Barriers 25   4.2.3   Opportunities 26   4.2.4   Financial 27   4.3   Company C 27   4.3.1   How do they work international? 27   4.3.2   Obstacles 28   4.3.3   Opportunities 29   4.3.4   Financial 29   5   ANALYSIS 30   5.1   Competitive advantage for SMEs 30   5.2   Strategies of internationalization process 32   6   DISCUSSION 35   7   CONCLUSION 37   8   FUTURE RESEARCH 39   9   REFERENCES 41       CHALMERS,  Civil  and  Environmental  Engineering,  Master’s  Thesis  2015:72   IV Acknowledgements This  thesis  has  been  carried  out  from  October  of  2014  to  April  of  2015  under  the   programme  of  international  project  management  at  Chalmers  University  of   Technology.       I  would  like  to  thank  my  supervisor  Martine  Buser  at  Chalmers  University  of   Technology  for  the  supervision  through  out  the  process  and  the  help  in   conducting  the  interviews.       I  also  thank  all  of  the  interviewees,  thanks  for  the  contribution  with  time  and   competences  that  made  this  thesis  possible  to  conduct.       Göteborg  April  2015     Ellen  Jacobsson         CHALMERS  Civil and Environmental Engineering, Master’s Thesis 2015:72 V           CHALMERS  Civil and Environmental Engineering, Master’s Thesis 2015:72 1   1 Introduction It   is  becoming  more  and  more  common  to   internationalize  business  or  parts  of   business.   The   internationalization   process   affects   various   types   of   industries,   which   in   this   case   have   been   narrowed   down   into   two   main   categories:   manufacturing   and   service   (Örberg   Jensen,   A   learning   perspective   on   the   offshoring  of   advanced   services,   2009).   In   this   case   focus   is   going   to  be  on   the   construction  industry,  especially  the  category  service  industry.  For  this  industry   the   demand   for   interaction   between   the   partners   is   high   and   each   and   every   project   is   unique   and   requires   different   types   of   competences   (Stringfellow,   Teagarden,  &  Winter,  2008).  There  is  a  current  lack  of  research  within  the  field   of   internationalization  of   the  construction   industry;   thus  researches  from  other   similar   industries   have  been  used   as   background   in   the   theoretical   framework   (Westhead,  Wright,  Ucbasaran,  &  Martin,  2010).     The  opportunities   to   expand   the  business  within  an   international   environment   have   been   improved   during   the   last   decades,   supported   by   improved   trading   laws   and   regulations.   The   technological   development   has   also   been   an   adding   factor  that  has  enabled  virtual  collaboration  all  over  the  world.    Even  if  the  tools   to   work   in   an   international   environment   are   provided,   the   growth   of   service   firms’  internationalization  has  been  slow  compared  to  manufacturing  (Grönroos,   1999).     Offshoring   is   one   strategy   used   within   the   internationalization   process.   Offshoring  means   that   a   service   or   a   product   is   sourced   from   a   foreign-­‐based   country  (Koch  &  Bennett,  2013).  Bunyaratavej  et  al.,  (2010,  pp.  71)  defines  it  as   “the   transnational   relocation   or   dispersion   of   services   related   activities   that   had   previously  been  performed  in  the  home  country”.   The   drivers   and   motivations   for   companies   to   internationalize   its   business   process   varies   depending   on   the   type   of   strategy   being   used.   Cost   cutting   and   resource  seeking  have  been   identified  to  be  the  main  drivers   for   the  offshoring   strategy.  It  can  also  be  adopted  for  other  types  of  internationalization  processes   (Cerruti,  2008).  The   internationalization  process  motives  can  also  be   to   try  out   new  markets  out  of  curiosity  or  that  an  opportunity  has  raised  with  a  too  good  to   miss   offer,   without   any   clear   motives   to   gain   new   knowledge   or   to   cut   costs   (Abdul-­‐Aziz,  Nor  Azmi,  Law,  &  Pengiran,  2013).     To  initiate  an  internationalization  process,  there  are  some  obstacles  and  barriers   that  must  be  faced.   It   is   important  to   identify  potential  barriers   in  advance  and   set  up  a  strategy   for  how  to  handle   them.  By  performing  a  risk  assessment   the   risks   identified   can   be   evaluated   and   be   included   in   the   strategy   and   be   monitored  throughout  the  process.   The  main  obstacles  identified,  have  been  divided  into  two  subcategories;  internal   and  external  (European  Commision  Enterprise  and  Industry,  2010).   The   top   management   often   drives   the   internationalization   processes.   Consequently   it   is   his   or  hers  personal  preferences   that   are   going   to   affect   the   outcome   of   the   process   (Cicic,   Patterson,   &   Shoham,   2002).   While   using   offshoring   as   a   strategy,   it   is   mostly   the   management   structure   within   the   company  that  affect  the  control  and  monitoring  of  the  processes.    (Farrell,  2004).     The  external  factors  are  barriers  outside  the  firm,  such  as  environmental  factors.   Most  of  the  factors  are  connected  with  the  lack  of  knowledge  of  the  new  market   (Westhead,  Wright,  Ucbasaran,  &  Martin,  2010).  The  main  external  barriers  faced   CHALMERS,  Civil  and  Environmental  Engineering,  Master’s  Thesis  2015:72   2 for   both   internationalization   processes   and   offshoring   strategies   are   communication  and   culture.   Since   the  host   country  most  probably  has  another   native   language,   it   is   of   out  most   importance   to   create   a   strategy   that   sets   the   communication   rules   within   the   project,   this   is   an   aspect   in   minimizing   the   misunderstandings  between  the  partners.  It  is  also  important  to  be  fully  aware  of   that  the  working  environment  and  culture  are  different  within  all  the  countries   around   the   world.   This   is   also   one   of   the   contributing   factors   for   misunderstandings   and   why   problems   occur   through   the   internationalization   process.       This   dissertation   has   collected   data   from   six   interviews   with   three   different   companies   where   two   of   them   are   SMEs   and   the   third   is   a   large   firm.   These   companies   are   all   active   within   an   international   environment.   Since   internationalization   and   offshoring   are   becoming   more   and   more   commonly   used  within  all   industries  today,   it   is  most   likely  to  be  a   future  scenario   for  the   construction  industry.     The  author  selected  this  subject,  by  identifying  a  current  lack  of  research  within   the  area;  Most  of   the  articles   identified,  was  dated  back   to   the  1980´s  and  was   adopted   on   other   industries   rather   than   the   construction   industry.   The   construction  industry  is  known  for  being  conservative  and  a  slow  adopter,  where   each  project  is  unique  (Balayse  &  Manley,  2004).  The  construction  industry  is  a   type  of  service  industry,  where  the  interaction  between  the  partners  is  extensive   and  the  possibility  to  interact  and  collaborate  is  a  critical  aspect  for  the  success   of  a  project.     Reviewing   the   general   business   environment   today,   it   is   becoming   more   and   more   common   to   internationalize  or  offshore  parts  of   the   in-­‐house  businesses.   The  goal  or  motivation  is  to  access  skilled  working  labour,  cut  costs  or  to  create   flexibility   within   the   company.   The   construction   industry   is   seen   as   slowly   adopters  and  conservative  when  it  comes  to  changes  (Balayse  &  Manley,  2004).   How   is   the   construction   industry  adopting   this  new  business  environment  and   can   it   be   beneficial   for   the   companies?   The   focus   of   this   thesis   is   on   small   to   medium  sized  enterprises,   SMEs,   since   they  do  not  have   the   same  structure  or   network  as  larger  firms.  What  are  the  benefits  if  they  succeed  with  the  process?   Would  it  be  beneficial  and  create  a  competitive  advantage  against  larger  or  other   competitors?     The   focus   is   on   companies   with   their   main   base   in   the   region   of   Gothenburg.   There  are  three  main  reasons  for  that  reasons  are  three  main  variables.  Firstly,  it   is   most   rational   since   the   author   is   based   in   Gothenburg.   Secondly   a   local   company,  Company  A,  was  identified  early  on  in  the  development  of  this  thesis.   This  company  had  started  an  internationalization  process  on  the  Chinese  market.   Third  and  final  is  the  aspect  that  the  construction  market  within  Gothenburg  is  a   stable  market  with  a  lot  of  new  and  potential  upcoming  projects.  Gothenburg  is   turning   400   years   in   2021   and   several   new   projects   and   buildings   as   well   as   urbanisation   projects   are   planed.  With   a   stable   home  market,   the   incentive   to   search  new  international  markets  decreases,  but  what  are  the  benefits  if  they  do?     1.1 Research question This   thesis   aims   at   answering   the   following   question   that   has   guided   the   collection  of  data  and   the  work,   throughout   the   thesis;   can   internationalization         CHALMERS  Civil and Environmental Engineering, Master’s Thesis 2015:72 3   processes  be  a  competitive  advantage  for  consulting  construction  SMEs  based  in   the  region  of  Gothenburg?   1.2 Research aim and objectives Since   the   competitive   business   climate   within   the   construction   industry   is   constantly   getting   tougher,   new  ways   to   improve   competitiveness   needs   to   be   found.   Expanding   within   the   international   market   is   one   way   to   investigate,   would   it  be  an  alternative   to  create  a   competitive  advantage?  The   focus  of   this   thesis   is   going   to   be   the   small   to   medium   sized   enterprises,   SMEs,   and   how   internationalization  can  be  used  as  a  competitive  advantage.  Different  strategies   to   set   up   an   internationalization   process   are   also   going   to   be   identified.   Interviews  with   three   different   companies   have   been   performed,   examine   and   identifying  different  opportunities  and  obstacles  involved  in  the  process.   The   following   research   question   has   been   formulated   in   order   to   meet   the   purpose  of  this  thesis:   • Can offshoring engineering be used as competitive advantage for small to medium sized enterprises within the region of Gothenburg? • How does the internationalization process look like for the interviewed SMEs companies compared to the large company studied? Subsequently, what are the different strategies, pros and cons? 1.3 Research method The  way  of  handling  international  business  varies  depending  on  type  of  company   and   type   of   industry.   Since   internationalization   is   a   rather   new   phenomenon   within   the   construction   industry,   especially   for   SMEs,   a   qualitative   research   approach   has   been   used.   The   main   data   collection   source   has   been   semi-­‐ structured  interviews.  Data  has  also  been  collected  through  previous  thesis  and   grey  literature  on  the  specific  projects  and  companies.     1.4 Scope and limitations Regarding   internationalization   and   offshoring  within   the   construction   industry   for  SMEs  there  are  limited  research  identified,  therefore  theories  based  on  other   industries  have  been  adopted  in  this  study.   The  focus  on  this  study  is  going  to  be  the  internationalization  of  SMEs  within  the   construction  industry.  As  the  main  data  collection  source,   interviews  have  been   used.  The   interviews  have  been  performed  on   three  different   companies.  With   respect  to  the  companies  involved  in  this  study,  the  identities  of  these  companies   are  not  being  revealed  in  this  thesis.  The  study  is  conducted  with  companies  with   its  base  in  Sweden.  Due  to  limitations  in  time  and  resources,  contact  has  not  been   established  with  their  international  partners.   1.5 Dissertation structure In   figure   1   a   guide   for   this   master   thesis   is   presented.   The   first   part   is   a   presentation   of   the   theoretical   framework   presenting   previous   research   and   important   aspects   to   consider   in   the   process   of   performing   a   successful   internationalization   and   offshoring   business.   The   purpose   is   to   create   background   knowledge   for   the   reader   to   understand   the   concept   of   internationalization   and   offshoring   as   a   strategy.   This   is   followed   up  with   the   methodology  chapter,  describing  the  methods  used  to  conduct  this  master  thesis.   CHALMERS,  Civil  and  Environmental  Engineering,  Master’s  Thesis  2015:72   4 This   is   followed   up   by   the   findings   from   the   interviews.   The   findings   is   then   analysed  and  discussed  with   the   theory  as  background.  The   thesis   ends  with  a   conclusion  with  suggestions  of  further  studies  within  the  subject.       Figure 1 Dissertation structure. Theoretical   framwork   Metodology   Analysis  and   disscusion   Conclution  and   recomendation         CHALMERS  Civil and Environmental Engineering, Master’s Thesis 2015:72 5   2 Theoretical framework The  way  to  internationalize  the  business  can  be  set  up  and  done  in  a  number  of   different   ways.   The   theoretical   framework   begins   by   introducing   the   internationalization  process  and  the  background  of  it.  This  is  followed  up  with  a   description   of   different   strategies   on   how   to   internationalize   business   and   the   concept   of   offshoring.   The   drivers   and   motivations,   and   the   barriers   and   obstacles   for   the   different   concepts   are   similar.   Therefore   they   have   been   presented   together   in   the   subcategories.   After   the   presentation   of   the   internationalization  and  offshoring  strategies,   it  will  be  followed  up  by  decision   process  and  a  summary  of  the  findings  from  the  theoretical  framework.     2.1 Internationalization process Most   industries   can   adapt   to   and   internationalize   its   whole   or   parts   of   its   business   processes,   but   to   simplify   they   can   be   narrowed   down   in   to   two   different  categories;  (1)  Manufacturing  and  (2)  Service.  Manufacturing  industry   is   industries   that   physical   produce   products,   it   can   also   include   the   most   standardized   processes,   such   as   phone   or   custom   services,   processes   or   tasks   that  can  be  solved  without  having  a  specific  knowledge  or  a  engineering  degree   (Örberg   Jensen,   2009).   Service   industries   are   processes   or   tasks   that   are   advanced   and   usually   demand   an   engineering   degree,   i.e.   R&D,   IT   and   finance   (Offshoring  Research  Network,  2007).     Most  of  the  research  within  the  field  of   internationalization  processes  has  been   done  on  the  manufacturing  industry,  where  the  research  within  service  sector  in   the   literature   is   fragment   (Westhead,  Wright,  Ucbasaran,  &  Martin,   2010).   The   traditional  motive   for   firms  to   internationalize   is   to   identify  potentials   that  can   generate  a  business  advantage.  The  most  commonly  known  process  is  within  the   manufacturing   industry.   By   moving   production   to   countries,   where   the   production   costs   usually   are   cheaper,   i.e.   to   reduce   costs,   (Westhead,   Wright,   Ucbasaran,   &   Martin,   2010).   The   internationalization   of   service   firms   are   becoming   a   considerable   part   of   the   internationalization   processes,   and   the   academic   research   has   the   responsibility   to   fill   the   knowledge   gaps   that   exists   today  (Grönroos,  1999).   The   internationalization   processes   for   service   firms   are   constantly   growing   in   both  developed  and  developing  countries  (Freeman  &  Sandwell,  2008).  There  is   around  85%  of  small  firms  that  to  some  degree  indirect  already  operating  on  the   international   market,   by   buying   gods   or   services   from   foreign   countries   (Westhead,   Wright,   Ucbasaran,   &   Martin,   2010).   During   the   last   decade   the   trading   regulations   have   been   improved   with   free-­‐trade   conditions,   but   the   internationalization  process  of   service   firms  have  had  a   slow  grow  so   far.  This   might  depend  on  the  fact  that  the  service  industry  is  more  complex  and  the  firm   lack   knowledge   how   to   promote   its   service   on   an   international   market   (Grönroos,  1999).   In   the   article   “Internationalization   of   construction-­‐   related   impact   of   age   and   size”  Abdul-­‐Aziz  et  al.   (2013,  pp  149)  states  that  “there  is  a  correlation  between   the   level   of   economic   development   and   outward   foreign   direct   investment”.   It   is   therefore  important  to  be  aware  of  the  image  of  the  host  country  and  that  it  can   influence  the  purchasing  pattern  (Abdul-­‐Aziz,  Nor  Azmi,  Law,  &  Pengiran,  2013).     CHALMERS,  Civil  and  Environmental  Engineering,  Master’s  Thesis  2015:72   6 2.1.1 Internationalization strategies There  are  a  number  of  different  strategies  or  opportunities  that  can  be  used  to   internationalize   the  business.  Service   firms  are  more   likely   than  manufacturing   firms   to   be   dragged   in   to   international   business.   The   service   firms   tend   to   be   following  its  clients  abroad  in  their  internationalization  process  (Abdul-­‐Aziz,  Nor   Azmi,  Law,  &  Pengiran,  2013).     Internationalization  may  also  arise  from  too-­‐good-­‐to-­‐miss  opportunities  (Abdul-­‐ Aziz,  Nor  Azmi,  Law,  &  Pengiran,  2013).  When  an  opportunity  arises,  for  example   to  follow  a  client  abroad,  a  too-­‐good-­‐to-­‐miss  opportunity  has  occurred  and  lead   the  company  on  to  an  internationalization  process.     The   different   strategies   and   opportunities   presented   above   can   be   narrowed   down   in   five   stages   that   can  be  used   as   guidelines   for   companies   that  want   to   internationalize  its  business.  The  stages  are  (1)  enter  new  markets,  (2)  product   specialization,  (3)  value  chain  disaggregation,  (4)  value  chain  reengineering  and   (5)  creation  of  new  markets.  The  stages  are  illustrated  in  figure  2,  below.       Figure 2 Internationalization processes (Farrell, 2004). (1)   Enter   new  markets   is   one   of   the   steps   in   the   internationalization   process,   which  enables  access  to  new  customers.  It  might  become  necessary  to  start  up  an   office  within   the   country   to   enable   the  business   concerning   import   and   export   regulation.   (2)   Product   specialization   is   connected   to   the   location   of   the   host   country.   There   are   different   regions   and   countries   that   are   specialists   (Farrell,   2004)   on   different   technology   areas   such   as   Silicon   Valley,   known   for   their   expertise  within  IT  (Business  Dictionary,  2014).  (3)  Value  chain  disaggregation  is   about  maximizing  the  profit  and  quality,   to   locate   the  different  process   in   their   “expertise”   location.  (4)  Value  chain  reengineering  is  to  move  processes  to  new   location  where  there  is  a  new  market  to  consider,  which  means  that  the  product   needs  to  be  improved  and  fitted  to  the  local  market.  (5)  Creation  of  new  markets   is  about  the  expansion  and  penetrate  the  new  market  (Farrell,  2004).   As   stated   by   Farrell   (2004,   pp.   87)   “The   five   stages   aren´t   necessarily   a   rigid   sequence  that  all  industries  follow;  companies  can  skip  or  combine  steps”   The   location   of   the   host   country   can   create   communication   issues   where   language   can   be   considered   to   become   a   risk.   These   language   risks   can   be   divided   in   to   three   different   sub   areas;   low-­‐,   medium-­‐,   and   high   interaction   distance.   This   is   dependent  mainly   on   language   and   how   far   it   is   between   the   different   countries.   As   an   example;   a   company   within   US   would   considerer   Canada,   Australia   and   UK   as   low   interaction   distance   since   all   of   them   has   English   as   their   first   language.   Medium   interaction   distance   would   be   other   countries  that  have  a  lot  of  experience  with  English,  such  as  India  that  is  a  former   UK  colony  and  most  European  countries.  Low  interaction  distances  are  countries         CHALMERS  Civil and Environmental Engineering, Master’s Thesis 2015:72 7   that  have   low  knowledge   in  English,   such  as  China   (Stringfellow,  Teagarden,  &   Winter,  2008).   2.2 Offshoring engineering The   two  concepts  of  outsourcing  and  offshoring  often  gets  mixed  up  with  each   other,   they  differ   from  each  other  but  at   the  same  time  overlap  each  other  and   have  common  processes  (Koch  &  Bennett,  2013).    Hätönen  &  Eriksson  (2009,  pp.   142)   defines   outsourcing   as   “the   transfer   of   activities   and   processes   previously   conducted   internally   to   an   external   party”   and   offshoring   is   according   to   Bunyaratavej   et   al.,   (2010,   pp.   71)   defined   as   “the   transnational   relocation   or   dispersion  of  services  related  activities  that  had  previously  been  performed  in  the   home  country”.     Clarification  of  the  concepts,  offshoring  means  that  a  service  or  product  is  bought   from  a   foreign-­‐based  country  and  bounded   to  a   location,  geographic  boundary,   when   outsourcing   means   buying   from   another   company,   not   depending   on   location,  firm  boundary  (Koch  &  Bennett,  2013).  A  combination  of  these  concepts   creates   four  different   strategic   approaches   (Bunyaratavej,  Doh,  Hahn,  Lewin,  &   Massini,  2010).  See  table  1.     Insourcing   Outsourcing   Onshore   Internal  domestic  provision   Domestic  outsourcing   Offshore   Captive/foreign   subsidiary   offshoring   Offshore  outsourcing   Table 1 Combination of offshoring and outsourcing (Koch & Bennett, 2013). Captive  offshoring  means  that  a  company  both  owns  and  runs  the  offshored  unit   in   another   country.   Offshore   outsourcing   is   when   a   company   simultaneously   transfer  ownership  and  location  of  an  activity  (Koch  &  Bennett,  2013).     Offshoring   of   services   may   depend   on   the   lack   of   skilled   labour   within   the   developed   countries   while   it   in   development   countries   there   are   excess   of   engineers.  Therefore  they  do  not  have  any  other  alternative  than  to  start  looking   abroad  (Örberg  Jensen,  2009).   In  the  article  by  Hätönen  &  Eriksson,  (2009)  the  historical  aspects  of  outsourcing   are  discussed,   since  offshoring  and  outsourcing   is   two  concepts   that   is  directly   linked.  The  historical  aspects  for  outsourcing  are  also  relevant  in  understanding   and  background  of  the  concept  of  offshoring  (Matwinska  &  Perbom,  2013).     The   phenomenon   of   outsourcing   can   be   dated   back   to   the   1950s,   but   it   was   mainly   in   the   1980’s   that   it   became   more   common   used   and   adopted   by   companies   (Hätönen  &  Eriksson,   2009)   In   the   beginning   it  was   predominantly   manufacturing   companies   that   relocated   their   processes   abroad   as   a   way   to   reduce  costs  through  lower  labour  costs  (Lewin  &  Volberda,  2011).  However  the   expansion   in   the  recent  years  has  driven   it  more   towards  a  cooperative  nature   and  access   to  skilled   labour  (Örberg   Jensen,  2009),  where   the  cost  reduction   is   no  longer  the  main  reason.  (Hätönen  &  Eriksson,  2009).     Hätönen   &   Eriksson   (2009)   have   in   their   article   “30+   years   of   research   and   practice  of  outsourcing-­‐  Exploring  the  past  and  anticipating  the   future”  divided   the  history   of   outsourcing   in   to   three  different   eras;   big   bang,   bandwagon   and   CHALMERS,  Civil  and  Environmental  Engineering,  Master’s  Thesis  2015:72   8 barrier   less  organizations.  The  big  bang  era  arose   from  when  companies   in   the   1980s   first   started   to   move   processes   to   other   external,   domestic   companies   with  the  aim  of  reducing  costs.  This  era  was  followed  up  by  the  bandwagon  era   where  now  the   focus  was  moved  from  only  reduce  cost,   instead  the  companies   now   are   searching   for   new   skills   and   knowledge.   The   last   era,   barrier   less   organizations,  where  outsourcing  now  is  needed  and  companies  has  to  include  it   in  their  strategies  to  survive  on  the  market.  The  eras  is  summarised  in  table  2.       Big  bang   Bandwagon   Barrier   less   organizations   Time   1980s   to   early   1990s   Early   1990s   to   early   2000   From   early   2000   onwards   Prime  motives   Cut  cost   Cut   costs,   capability   enhancement,  process   improvement   Organizational   transformation   Buzzword   Outsourcing   Strategic  outsourcing     Transformational   outsourcing   Outsource   location   Domestic   International   Global   Strategic   rationalization   Profit  maximizing   Strategic   and   competitive  edge   Survival   Outsourcing   objects   Structured   and   well   defined   turnkey   manufacturing   processes   Strategically   important   organisational   process   Project   highly   knowledge-­‐ incentive   and   creative   in   nature   Main  theories   Transaction   cost   theory   Resource/competence   based  view   Organisational   theories   Table 2 Illustration of the characteristics and development of outsourcing (Hätönen & Eriksson, 2009). Offshoring  can  be  seen  as  a  strategy,  not  only  for  larger  firms  but  also  for  small   and  start-­‐ups.  It  enables  for  the  companies  to  focus  on  their  core  competence,  or   it  can  be  used  as  a  strategy  for  the  company  to  expand  their  business.    For  small   start-­‐ups   it   can   be   a   beneficial   method   used   for   speeding   up   the   process   of   introducing  their  new  product  on  the  market  (Bunyaratavej,  Doh,  Hahn,  Lewin,  &   Massini,  2010).   2.3 Drivers and motivations in the internationalization process and offshoring strategy The   drives   for   service   firms   to   internationalize   their   business   are   different   compared   with   manufacturing   companies   (Westhead,   Wright,   Ucbasaran,   &   Martin,  2010).  Manufacturing  companies  tend  to  search  an  international  market   to  gain  access  to  lower  labour  cost,  where  for  service  firms  the  prime  driver  is  to   find  new  markets  and  gain  access  to  new  knowledge  (Bunyaratavej,  Doh,  Hahn,   Lewin,   &   Massini,   2010).   There   are   no   significant   differences   in   the   drivers   between  large  and  small  firms  to  internationalize  (Abdul-­‐Aziz,  Nor  Azmi,  Law,  &   Pengiran,  2013).     The  driver  to  internationalize  is  often  due  to  the  market  share  is  decreasing,  lack   of  knowledge  on  the  domestic  market  or  access  to  cheaper  working  labour.  If  the         CHALMERS  Civil and Environmental Engineering, Master’s Thesis 2015:72 9   home  market  can  accommodate  these  needs,   it  becomes  less  attractive  to   leave   the  domestic  market  (Sullivan  &  Bauerschmidt,  1990).     For  service  companies  there  might  be  additional  values  to  internationalize.  The   time   difference   between   the   countries   around   the   world,   enables   service   providers   to   provide   around   the   clock   service.   This   is   something   that   creates   benefits  for  the  company  and  their  customers  and  can  be  used  as  a  competitive   advantage.   Stringfellow,   Teagarden   &   Winter   (2008,   pp.165)   states   that   “This   around-­‐the-­‐clock   operation   reduce   the   time   to   market   in   addition   to   its   cost   advantage”.   Within  the  internationalization  process  the  company  management  are  playing  an   important  role.  It  is  their  personality  and  risk  taking  that  affects  their  decision  to   either   internationalize   or   not   (Oviatt   &   McDougall,   2005).   They   tend   to   be   somewhat   over-­‐enthusiastic   to   internationalize   their   company   and   therefore   ignore   the   complexities   that   may   arise   in   the   process.   The   prim   motives   to   internationalize  are  to  identified  and  sustain  the  firm  growth  and  increasing  the   profitability  (Abdul-­‐Aziz,  Nor  Azmi,  Law,  &  Pengiran,  2013).     2.3.1 Cost reduction Cost  reduction   is   the  main  driver   for  companies  to  start   internationalization  or   offshoring  activities  (Bunyaratavej,  Doh,  Hahn,  Lewin,  &  Massini,  2010).  The  two   main  reasons  to  cost  reduction  are  (1)  processes  efficiency  and  (2)  lower  labour   costs.   (1)   Process   efficiency   is   an   example   from   the   manufacturing   industry,   which  means  that   it  will  generate  a  higher  productivity.  (2)  Lower  labour  costs   refer   to   lower   wages   than   within   the   domestic   market   (Cerruti,   2008).   The   calculation   needs   to   be   based   on  what   industry   and  within  which   country   the   internationalization  or  offshoring  activity  is  taking  place.    As  identified  in  table  3   below   identification  of   the  perceived  effects  based  on   the   triple  constrain   time,   cost  and  quality  (COE,  Committee  on  Offshoring  of  engineering,  2008).       Table 3 Impact Matrix (European Commision Enterprise and Industry, 2010). Impact  Matrix   Performance   Metric   More   than  10%   increase   0-­‐10%   increase   Same   0-­‐10%   reduction   More   than   10%reduction   Engineering   cost     4%   2%   7%   39%   48%   Construction   cost   -­‐   4%   75%   17%   4%   Engineering   time   2%   18%   48%   24%   8%   Overall   project   -­‐ delivery  time   -­‐   9%   59%   30%   2%   Engineering   quality   6%   11%   65%   18%   -­‐   Construction   quality   2%   19%   72%   7%   -­‐   CHALMERS,  Civil  and  Environmental  Engineering,  Master’s  Thesis  2015:72   10 It  is  important  to  be  aware  that  it  may  occur  hidden  costs  and  other  risks  in  an   unknown   environment.   By   approaching   countries   that   has   a   similar   business   environment  the  risks  can  be  minimized  (Bunyaratavej,  Hahn,  &  Doh,  2007),  but   also   by   choosing   a   country   that   is   English-­‐speaking   or   at   least   has   a   basic,   medium  interaction  distance  of  the  language  (Dossani  &  Kenney,  2003).   The  cost  reduction  that  is  gained  by  moving  business  processes  to  other  parts  of   the  world   is  often  costs  associated  with   labour  costs   (Bunyaratavej,  Doh,  Hahn,   Lewin,   &   Massini,   2010).   The   scale   of   the   cost   reduction   differs   between   the   industries,  Bunyaratavej   et   al.   (2010)   states   “offshoring  of  knowledge  work  may   place   firms   at   a   long   term   disadvantage   despite   short-­‐term   cost   savings”.   The   companies   that  work   in  development   countries   are  well   aware   of   the   fact   that   their  services  is  needed  by  companies  in  the  developed  countries  and  therefore   costs  for  skilled  labour  is  almost  as  high.  The  developed  countries  do  also  have  a   lack  of  the  right  resources  to  perform  the  task  by  themselves  (Manning,  Massini,   &  Lewin,  2008).   2.3.2 Resource seeking Internationalization   and   offshoring   is   no   longer   just   about   moving   manufacturing   and  back-­‐office   operation   to   India   or   China   to   reduce   cost.   It   is   about   finding   the   right   talent   to   sustain   the   innovation   within   the   company   (Offshoring  Research  Network,  2007).  Depending  on   this  aspect,   service  driven   offshoring   main   driver   is   to   seek   new   knowledge   and   skilled   labour   (Örberg   Jensen,  2012).   Internationalization  and  offshoring  of   services  are  done  because   companies   cannot   find   enough   skilled   labour   to   bring   in-­‐house   (Offshoring   Research  Network,  2007),  and   therefore  do  not  have  any  alternative   to  get   the   needed  knowledge  than  to  move  abroad.  The  incentive  to  study  and  get  a  science   and   engineering   degree   is   higher   in   development   countries   compared   to   developed  countries  (Manning,  Massini,  &  Lewin,  2008).   Since   internationalization   of   services   is   a   rather   new  phenomena   compared   to   offshoring   of   manufacturing,   new   processes   needs   to   be   developed   and   processed  (Offshoring  Research  Network,  2007).   With   the   speed   on   the   global   market   today,   it   becomes   even   harder   to   find   knowledge   and   skilled   labour   on   the   market.   It   may   therefore   become   more   important   to  establish  business  with  several  providers  or   locations   (Offshoring   Research  Network,  2007).  With  this  rapid  environment,  it  may  also  be  important   that   the   authority   to   take   decisions   may   be   transferable   within   the   company,   authorizing  the  person  with  the  best  background  information  and  knowledge,  to   take  the  decision  (Offshoring  Research  Network,  2007).     2.4 Barriers and obstacles in the internationalization process and offshoring strategy Sometimes   companies   may   not   reach   the   expected   outcome   of   the   internationalization   or   offshoring   process   because   they   cannot   overcome   the   barriers   faced   in   the  processes   (European  Commision  Enterprise  and   Industry,   2010).     Companies   that   not   yet   have   taken   the   step   of   internationalization   may   underestimate   some  of   the   barriers   but   also   overestimate   others.   The   barriers   for   companies   can   be   divided   in   to   two   sub-­‐groups,   internal   and   external   barriers  (European  Commision  Enterprise  and  Industry,  2010).         CHALMERS  Civil and Environmental Engineering, Master’s Thesis 2015:72 11   The   international   attitude   that   the   top  management   and   chef   executive   officer   has  in  relation  to  the  international  barriers  identified,  the  attitude  from  the  top   managers   may   change   based   on   the   risks   or   benefits   identified   in   an   internationalization  process  (Cicic,  Patterson,  &  Shoham,  2002).   As  Cicic,  Patterson  &  Shoham  (2002,  pp.  1106)  writes  in  the  report  “Antecedents   of   international   performance   A   service   firms´   perspective”   “The   higher   the   perceived  internal  and  external  international  barriers,  the  lower  the  performance”.   If  the  firm  identify  the  barriers  and  dedicate  resources  on  how  to  handle  them  in   advance,  the  impact  of  them  can  be  reduced.  He  also  states  that  “The  higher  the   perceived   importance   of   internal   and   external   international   barriers,   the   more   negative  the  firm´s  international  attitude”     2.4.1 Internal barriers The   internal  barriers  are  barriers   that  are  directly   connected   to   the   firm   itself.   The  decision  to  internationalize  the  business  is  usually  made  by  the  top  manager   or   the  chief  executive  officer  of   the  company,  and   it   is   therefore  based  on  their   personal   experiences   and   preferences.   These   preferences   and   experience   is   something  that  also  going  to  be  affected  the  outcome  of  the  internationalization.     There   are   two   different   components   that   affect   the   internationalization   processes   internally,   and   these   are   the   attitude   and   behaviour   that   the   top   manager  has  towards  it.  Cicic,  Patterson  &  Shoham  (2002,  pp.  1107)  states  “The   more  positive  the  international  attitudes  of  top  management,  the  stronger  the  level   of  management  support  and  international  strategic  commitment  effort  used  by  the   firm”.       Internationalization  for  service  firms  are  considered  to  be  more  risky  compared   to   the  manufacturing   industry.   This   is   argued   to   depend   on   that   service   firms   need   to   have   more   control   over   the   processes   and   the   resources   put   in,   compared  to  what  a  manufacturing  firm  would  have  (Grönroos,  1999).   A   survey   presented   by   European   Commision   Enterprise   and   Industry   (2010)   highlights   the   main   participation   barriers   that   SMEs   sees   with   internationalization   and   offshoring;   the   high   cost   of   internationalization.   To   address   this   concern   there  are  a  number  of   strategies   that   can  be  put   together   which  makes  it  simpler  to  react  on.  The  survey  also  shows  that  companies  with   an   internationalization  or  offshoring  strategy  are  more   likely   to  achieve  higher   results   compared   to   companies   that   do   not   have   any   because   they   are   more   aware  of   the   risks   and   location   factors   that   affects   the  outcome   (Bunyaratavej,   Doh,  Hahn,  Lewin,  &  Massini,  2010).   There   are   three   organisational   factors   that   affect   the   outcome   and   success   of   internationalization  and  offshoring.  These  are   internal  management   structures,   incentive  systems  and  unionization  (Farrell,  2004).  It  is  important  to  be  aware  of   what  obstacles  that  may  be  faced  during  the  globalisation,  and  how  they  can  be   turned   in   to   an   advantage   (Stringfellow,   Teagarden,   &   Winter,   2008).   The   processes   also   affect   the   contact   and   interaction   that   is   needed   between   both   parts.   How  the  barriers  are  perceived  differs  a  lot  between  companies  that  already  are   working   in   an   international   environment   and   those   who   only   have   plans   on   doing  it.  Companies  that  are  not  yet  active  on  the  international  market  perceived   the   barriers   20%   higher   than   companies   that   are   active   on   the   international   market  (European  Commision  Enterprise  and  Industry,  2010).   CHALMERS,  Civil  and  Environmental  Engineering,  Master’s  Thesis  2015:72   12 2.4.2 External barriers The  external  barriers  are  obstacles   that   the   firm  face   in  an   internationalization   process.  It  is  factors  outside  of  the  company;  such  as  environmental  factors  with   time   distance,   language   differences   etc.   The   external   barriers   are   different   depending  on  what  market  being  approached,  if  it  is  the  EU-­‐EEA  market  or  third   markets   (European   Commision   Enterprise   and   Industry,   2010).   Most   of   the   barriers  and  risks  to   internationalize  are  connected  with  the   lack  of  knowledge   of  the  new  market  (Westhead,  Wright,  Ucbasaran,  &  Martin,  2010).     It  is  important  to  be  aware  of  the  effect  the  host  market  has  on  the  business.  The   host   countries   political   and   economic   situation   affects   the   outcome.   It   is   also   important  to  be  aware  of  the  business  situation  within  the  host  market,  whether   or   not   the   competition   is   based   on   lowest   cost   or   highest   quality   (Abdul-­‐Aziz,   Nor  Azmi,  Law,  &  Pengiran,  2013).  Another   important  aspect   is   to  be  aware  of   potential   trade   barriers   (Arnold,   2005)   and   absence   of   law   within   the   host   country  (Delios  &  Beamish,  2010).   The  distance  between  the  host  and  home  country  is  also  an  factor  that  affect  the   outcome  of  the  internationalization.  With  the  distance  it   is  also  important  to  be   aware   of   the   cultural   differences.   In   addition   there   are   also   the   differences   in   language   and   way   of   communication   (Welch,   Lawrence,   &   Marschan-­‐Piekkari,   2001).   These   aspects   of   cultural   and   language   are   becoming   even   more   important   to   be   aware   of   working   within   the   services   industry,   since   the   interaction   between   the   partners   are   more   extensive   comparing   to   a   manufacturing  industry  (Castellacci,  2010).   The   cultural   difference   is   an   important   aspect   to   be   aware   of,   to  minimize   the   risks   involved   in   the   internationalization  process.  As  Gesterland  (2012)  writes:   What   is   seen  as  polite   in  one   country   can  be   seen  as   rude   in  another  one.  The   culture   within   the   different   countries   can   be   divided   in   to   different   types   of   groups   such   as   deal   focused   (DF)   vs.   relationship   focused,   (RF),   or   direct   vs.   indirect  communication.  DF  countries’  and  persons  tend  to  be  more  task  focused   compared   with   RF   persons   and   countries   that   focus   more   on   the   person   and   relationships.   Examples   on   DF   countries   are   America   and  most   of   Europe   and   examples   on   RF   countries   are   most   of   Asia   and   mostly   mentioned   China.   If   business   is   done  within   its   own   country,   cultural   problems   do   not   need   to   be   taking   in   to   consideration.   Cultural   problems   occur   when   they   are   making   business   across   the   borders.   If   the   DF   persons   are   not   aware   of   this   the   RF   persons  often   finds   them  as   rude,  pushy  and  aggressive.  On   the  other  hand  DF   finds   RF   to   be   vague,   dilatory   and   even   dishonest.   When   it   comes   to   communication   DF   tend   to   use   a   more   direct   language   and   RF   use   indirect   language.  This  difference  tends  to  create  misunderstandings.  The  structure  of  the   organisation   is   also   an   aspect   that   affects   the   business   behaviour,   if   the   organisation  is  strict  hierarchical  or  flat.  All  of  these  aspects  are  of  importance  to   be  aware  of  to  minimize  the  risks  of  cultural  problems  (Gesterland,  2012).   As  Welch,  Lawrence  &  Marschan-­‐Piekkari  (2001,  pp  193)  writes  in  their  report   “The   persistent   Impact   of   Language   on   Global   Operations”   “Much   of   the   international   management   and   strategy   literature   reflects   a   common   view   that   language   is   the   embodiment   of   culture,  which   leads   to   the   bundling   of   language   within  the  broad  term  ‘culture’.”  Language  becomes  more  important  in  the  initial   stage  of  the   internationalization  process  when  the  first  connection  is  made  and   the  first  deal  is  about  to  close.  If  problems  occur  in  this  situation  communication         CHALMERS  Civil and Environmental Engineering, Master’s Thesis 2015:72 13   probably  would  be  problematic  throughout  the  process.  The  ability  to  handle  the   communication   lies   on   the   individuals   involved   in   the   process   and   not   in   the   organisation  (Welch,  Lawrence,  &  Marschan-­‐Piekkari,  2001).   2.5 Decision processes in the internationalization and offshoring processes for SMEs The  processes  for  the  decision  making  within  a  company,  differs  depending  on  a   number  of  aspects  such  as   type  of   industry,  size  and  the   individuals  within   the   company.  Example  of  the  theoretical  processes  and  decision  models  is  presented   below,  both  small  to  medium  sized  enterprises,  SMEs,  and  large  firms.   2.5.1 Decision processes It  needs   to  be  an  organisation  or   individual  behind   the  decision   taken  within  a   company.   Internationalization   and   offshoring   has   become   more   than   cutting   costs,  it  has  also  become  a  strategic  tool  for  companies  to  gain  flexibility,  access   to  global  talents  and  increasing  competitiveness  within  the  company  (Offshoring   Research  Network,  2007).     The   decision   process   is   shown   to   be   different   between   large   companies   and   SMEs.   Large   firms’   decision   process   is   characterised   to   be   goal-­‐driven,   planed   and   rational.   (Child   &   Hsieh,   2013).   While   SMEs   decision   tends   to   be   done   through   individual   leadership.   This   means   that   their   personal   characteristic   affects  the  strategic  decision.  They  also  tend  to  use  their  business  and  personal   network  as   information   source   in   the  decision  process.  To  make  a  decision,   an   input  of   information  to  trigger  the  process   is  needed.  Based  on  the  information   given,   a   decision   is   taken   through   personal   or   impersonal   network   (Nielsen  &   Nielsen,  2010).   Child   &   Hsieh   (2013,   pp.   599)   States   that   “Previous   research   suggest   that   the   approach  adopted  by  SMEs  leaders  toward  internationalization  and  their  network   ties  may  depend  on  a  number  of  factors,  including  firm  characteristics,  such  as  size,   age,  human  and  financial  resources,  their  link  with  sources  of  technology/scientific   knowledge,   their  prior   international  experience  and  knowledge,  and  the  extent  of   their   pre-­‐existing   contact   network”.   Four   decision   models   have   been   identified   and   illustrated   in   table   4.   The   decision   models   reflect   if   the   decision   of   internationalization  for  SMEs  is  planned  in  advance,  is  an  improvisation,  or  is  an   unplanned  response  to  change  in  opportunities  (Spence  &  Crick,  2006).   Decision   model   Feature   Planned?   Goal  driven?   Decision   rules?   Comparison   of   alternatives?   Reactivity   X   X   X   X   Incrementalism   Limited   X   X   Limited   Bounded   rationality   ✓   ✓   ✓   Partial     Real   options   reasoning   ✓   ✓   ✓   ✓   Table 4 Decision models (Child & Hsieh, 2013). Reactivity   means   that   the   decision   is   made   as   a   response   to   an   immediate   situation,   demand   or   environmental   change.   This   is   often   the   situation   within   small   family-­‐owned   firms   (Child   &   Hsieh,   2013).   Internationalization   can   for   example  be  done  when  a  domestic   customer   is   expanding   to  new  markets  and   CHALMERS,  Civil  and  Environmental  Engineering,  Master’s  Thesis  2015:72   14 the  SME  decides  to   follow  them  into  the  new  market.  A  reactive  decision  mode   “occasional  exporters”   respond   to  an  opportunity  when   it  occurs,  and  does  not   perform  international  business  on  a  regular  basis  (Seifert,  2010).   Incrementalism   is   characterised  by   vague   goals   that   is   often  defined   first   after   the   action   has   taken   place.  Most   of   the   firms   enter   new  markets  without   pre-­‐ identification  of  risks,  goals  or  objectives;  they  are  often  defined  as  a  result  from   the  action.  Mostly  the  decision  is  taking  in  a  same  type  of  way  as  in  the  familiar   market,   but   also   what   they   have   learned   from   their   mistakes   and   more   of   another  type  of  decision  mode  for  the  upcoming  situations  (Schweizer,  2012).   Bounded   rationality   is   goal   direct   and   tends   to   be   more   rational.   It   is   more   developed   with   criteria’s   and   rules   to   guide   the   decision   made   to   create   a   successful  and  satisfying  result.  As  Child  &  Hsieh,  (2013,  pp.  601)  define  “While   decision   makers   may   intend   to   be   rational,   their   cognitive   limits,   uncertainties,   limitations  of  time,  and  the  cost  of  securing  further  information  can  prevent  them   from  archiving  this”.   Real   options   reasoning,   ROR,   are   a   highly   rational   decision-­‐making  model   that   enables   to  minimize   the   risks   that   are   associated  with   globalization.   ROR   is   a   model  that   is  trying  to  be  proactive.  Therefore,  analyses  of   information  and  the   lack   of   it,   together   with   uncertainties   and   comparison   between   different   alternatives,   are   made   to   identify   the   best   strategy   for   the   company   and   to   maximize   the   value.     This  model   is  more   likely   to   be   used  within   larger   firms   than  SMEs  (Driouchi  &  Bennett,  2012).   2.6 Summary of theoretical framework The   internationalization   processes   can   be   set   up   and   done   in   a   number   of   different  ways,  therefore  the  theoretical  framework  is  starting  with  introducing   the  background  and  the  different  strategies  on  how  set  up  international  business.   After  this,  the  concept  of  offshoring  is  presented  and  how  it  has  developed  over   the   years,   followed  up  with   the   drivers   and  motivations   to   use   offshoring   as   a   strategy.  Directly  linked  to  this  is  also  the  barriers  faced  in  the  process.     There   are   some   factors   that   affect   both   the   internationalization   processes   and   the  offshoring  strategy.  It  is  the  basic  information  needed  to  understand  both  of   these  concepts:  Type  of  industry,  and  the  affect  that  the  cultural  difference  might   have  on  the  international  business  and  the  importance  of  communication.      (1)   Enter   new  markets   is   one   of   the   steps   in   the   internationalization   process,   which   means   that   it   might   become   necessary   to   create   an   office   within   the   country   to  support   the  business  concerning   import  and  export  regulation.       (2)   Product  specialization  is  connected  to  the  location  of  the  host  country,  there  are   different   regions   and   countries   that   are   specialists   (Farrell   2004)   in   different   areas,  such  as  silicon  valley  that  is  known  for  their  expertise  within  IT  (Business   Dictionary,  2014).  (3)  Value  chain  disaggregation  is  about  maximizing  the  profit   and  quality,   to   locate   the  different  processes   to   their   “expertise”   location.       (4)   Value   chain   reengineering   to  move  processes   to  new   location  where   there   is   a   new  market  to  consider,  which  means  that  the  product  needs  to  be  improved  and   fitted  to  the   local  market.       (5)  Creation  of  new  markets   is  about  the  expansion   and   penetrate   the   new   market   (Örberg   Jensen,   A   learning   perspective   on   the   offshoring  of  advanced  services,  2009).   (Abdul-­‐Aziz   et   al.   2013,   pp.   149)   writes   in   the   article   “Internationalization   of   construction-­‐  related  impact  of  age  and  size”  that  “There  is  a  correlation  between         CHALMERS  Civil and Environmental Engineering, Master’s Thesis 2015:72 15   the   level   of   economic   development   and   outward   foreign   direct   investment”.   It   is   therefore  important  to  be  aware  of  the  image  of  the  host  country  and  that  it  can   influence  the  purchasing  pattern.     In  the  internationalization  process,  there  are  a  number  of  obstacles  and  barriers   faced  for  the  top  management  or  the  chef  executive  officer  of  the  company.  The   barriers  faced  in  the  processes  are  both  external  and  internal  (Westhead,  Wright,   Ucbasaran,  &  Martin,   2010).   The   international   attitude  of   the   top  management   and   chef   executive   officer   in   relation   to   the   international   barriers,   the   attitude   from   the   top   managers   may   change,   regarding   the   risks   or   benefits   in   an   internationalization  process  (Cicic,  Patterson,  &  Shoham,  2002).   Most  of  the  barriers  and  risks  to  internationalize  are  connected  with  the  lack  of   knowledge  of  the  new  market  (Westhead,  Wright,  Ucbasaran,  &  Martin,  2010).  It   also   highlights   the   importance   of   establishing   an   internationalization   or   offshoring  strategy,  to  get  a  successful  outcome.     CHALMERS,  Civil  and  Environmental  Engineering,  Master’s  Thesis  2015:72   16 3 Methodology This  chapter   is  presenting  how  the  study  has  been  conducted  and  presents   the   methods   used   throughout   the   thesis.   Firstly   the   research   approach   presented,   this   is   followed   up   with   the   research   strategy   and   the   development   of   the   theoretical  framework.  Secondly  a  deeper  discretion  description  of  how  the  data   were  collected.  This  is  summed  up  with  an  analysis  of  the  result  identified.     3.1 Research approach There   are   different   ways   to   perform   and   carry   out   a   social   research.   A   social   research   is   a   research   approach   that   is   used   for   questions   regarding   social   scientific   grounds,   such   as   human   geography,   social   policy   and   politics.   The   theory  is  an  important  aspect  of  social  research,  since  it  provides  a  background   on  the  research  that  is  being  conducted.  It  is  therefore  important  to  be  aware  of   if   the  data   is   collected   to   test   the   theory  or   to  build   the   theory.  There   are   two   concepts   presented   about   this,   Deductive   theory,   where   theory   are   the   background   to   the   research   and   Inductive   theory,  where   the   research   findings   and  observations  guides  the  choice  of  theory  (Bryman,  2008).   The  research  approach  conduced  throughout  this  thesis,  cannot  be  represented   in  any  of  the  approaches  presented  above.  The  intention  was  to  use  a  deductive   approach  where  the  literature  was  collected  and  was  guiding  the  outcomes  and   findings   from   the   interviews   (Bryman,   2008).   Conducting   the   interviews   new   strategies  was  presented  and  therefore  an  abductive  theory  needed  to  be  used.   Dubois  &  Gradde  (2002,  pp.  555)  state   in  the  article  “Systematic  combining:  an   abductive   approach   to   case   research”   “A   standardized   conceptualization   of   the   research   process   as   consisting   of   a   number   of   planned   subsequent   “phases”   does   not   reflect   the   potential   uses   and   advantages   of   case   research.   Instead,   we   have   found   that   the   researcher,  by  constantly  going   “back  and   forth”   from  one   type  of   research  activity  to  another  and  between  empirical  observations  and  theory,  is  able   to  expand  his  understanding  of  both  theory  and  empirical  phenomena”.   3.1.1 Quantitative or Qualitative research When  selecting  a  research  approach,  it  is  important  to  be  aware  whether  or  not   the   thesis   does   have   a   quantitative   or   qualitative   research   approach.   A   quantitative  approach  can  be  related  to  a  deductive  theory,  where  the  literature   tests  the  findings.  It  is  also  an  approach  that  has  more  practices  and  norms  with   natural  science,  and  usually  are  findings  and  observations  in  numbers  (Bryman,   2008).   The  qualitative  approach  is  more  about  words  and  is  usually  connected  with  an   inductive  approach,  which  means  that  the  observations  and  findings  are  guiding   the   theory.   Interpretivism   is   an   approach   used,   where   human   behaviours   and   their  way  of  understanding  the  reality  is  studied.  It  is  also  commonly  used  where   the   main   data   collection   is   through   observations   and   interviews   (Research   Methodology,  2015).     Since   internationalization   with   SMEs,   active   on   the   construction   industry   is   a   rather  new  phenomenon,  there  are  limited  previous  research  to  access  and  only   a   few  companies  to  study.  The  qualitative  research  approach   is  connected  with   creating   understanding   and   explores   new   phenomena,   which   has   been   done         CHALMERS  Civil and Environmental Engineering, Master’s Thesis 2015:72 17   through   out   this   thesis.   Based   on   this   a   qualitative   research   method   with   an   interpretivist  approach  has  been  used.   3.1.2 Trustworthiness It  is  important  to  define  the  quality  of  the  conducted  qualitative  and  quantitative   research.   They   define   trustworthiness   as   a   way   of   assessing   qualitative   data.   Trustworthiness   is   built   up   by   four   criteria’s:   credibility,   transferability,   dependability  and  conformability  (Bryman,  2008).   Credibility   is   criteria   that   concern  how  believable   the   findings  are,  and  making   sure   that   the   study   has   been   carried   out   according   to   good   practice.   Within   credibility  there  are  another  aspect  that  can  be  carried  out  to  establish  that  good   practice  has  been  followed  and  using  triangulation,  which  means  that  more  than   one   source   for   the   data   collection   was   used   (Bryman,   2008).   To   secure   the   credibility   within   the   six   interviews   conducted,   they   were   followed   up   with   company   specific   information   gathered   online,   and   dissertations   already   performed   on   the   companies.   This   was   used   as   a   complement   to   the   data   collected  in  the  interviews.     Transferability  is  a  question  whether  or  not  the  findings  can  be  transferred  in  to   other   areas  of   research?   Since   a   qualitative   research   approach  means   in-­‐depth   study   of   individuals   and   smaller   groups   witch   is   usually   connected   with   an   extent  of  uniqueness  within  the  social  world  (Bryman,  2008).  Since,  this  thesis  is   keeping   it   open   for   other   companies   to   use,   other   industries   with   similar   difficulties   identified   in   the   construction   industry   can   adapt   to   the   presented   theories.   Dependability  questioned  whether  or  not  the  findings  are  applicable  in  another   times  period?   (Bryman,  2008)  Most  of   the   information   that   is  presented   in   the   thesis  is  up  to  date  and  time  relevant  within  the  field.  Since  there  is  a  current  lack   of   research   within   the   field,   research   based   on   other   industries   has   been   necessary,  it  is  going  to  be  up  to  date  for  numbers  of  years  ahead.     Conformability,   has   the   authors   values   been   affecting   the   data?   In   qualitative   research,  the  authors’  perspective  is  always  going  to  affect  to  some  extent,  but  it   is   important   to   exclude  personal   values   out   of   the   study   and   act  with   an   open   mind  and  with  good  faith  (Bryman,  2008).  The  research  is  based  on  a  theoretical   framework   where   literature   studies   has   been   done   by   the   author   and   also   in   collaboration   with   Martine   Buser   and   the   project   of   “strategic   innovative   practices   global   alliances   in   the   Swedish   AEC   industry-­‐   preparing   for   opportunities”.     3.2 Development of theoretical framework The  theoretical  framework  is  based  on  literature  and  theories  on  the  concepts  of   internationalization   and   offshoring,   there   are   a   current   lack   of   result   from   the   field   on   how   this   concepts   are   working   within   the   construction   industry,   therefore   the   literature   has   been   gathered   from   other   industries   such   as   the   manufacturing  and  IT  (Hätönen  &  Eriksson,  2009).   The   aim   of   the   theoretical   framework   is   to   create   an   understanding   on   the   subjects  of  internationalization  processes  and  offshoring  strategies.  The  purpose   is   to   enable   a   deeper   analysis   of   the   findings   from   the   interviews.   Since   the   author  has  went  back  and  forth  within  the  different  parts,  they  have  influenced   each   other   and   the   theoretical   aspects   has   been   developed   after   the   interview   CHALMERS,  Civil  and  Environmental  Engineering,  Master’s  Thesis  2015:72   18 had   been   conducted   since   new   information   was   presented   and   to   be   able   to   conduct  an  analyse,  more  backgrounds  information  was  needed.     The   theoretical   background   is   based   on   search   throw   reliable   databases   using   keyword  as  internationalization  process,  internationalization  process  within  the   construction   industry,   offshoring,   business   culture,   international   environment   and  communication.  The  snowball  effect  has  also  been  one  of  the  approaches,  by   identifying   relevant   articles   or   reports   and   using   their   references   lists.   The   supervisor,   at   Chalmers   University   of   Technology,   has   also   provided   relevant   articles.     3.3 Data collection The   data   was   collected   throw   interviews   with   three   different   companies.   The   interviews   was   semi-­‐structured,   which   creates   a   flexibility   in   the   interview   where  only  guidelines  are  put  up  before  and  the  questions  does  not  have  to  be   asked   in   a   specific   order.   The   interviewee  does   have   a   great   deal   of   leeway   to   reply.   It   also   allows   asking  upcoming  questions  during   the   interview   (Bryman,   2008).   Semi-­‐structured   interview   can   also   be   a   benefit   since   the   interviewer   does  only  have  one  chance  to  conduct  the  interview  (Cohen  &  Crabtree,  2006).   The   key   questions   to   the   interviews  were   prepared   before   the   interview.   The   specific  questions  was  not  send  in  advance,  however  a  short  description  on  what   subject   to   be   discussed   during   the   interview  was   seen   out.   The   questions  was   designed   with   an   open   ending   where   the   interviewed   had   the   possibility   to   discuss  the  response.     3.4 Respondents The   identification   of   the   right   persons   to   conduct   the   interviewees   with   was   important   for   the   trustworthiness   of   this   thesis.   A   total   of   six   interviews  were   performed,   three   of   the   interviews   were   conducted   with   company   A,   two   interviews  with  company  B  and  one  interview  with  company  C.  The  position  of   the   interviewees   is   illustrated   in   table   5,   in   chapter   4   Findings.     They   were   identified   to   be   exclusively   responsible   for   the   internationalization   and   offshoring  strategies  within  the  different  companies.       Company  A  was  identified  early  on  in  the  processes,  based  on  a  previous  master   thesis   performed   at   the   division   of   construction   management   on   a   similar   subject.   It   was   their   innovative   international   interaction   with   China   that   was   interesting  for  this  thesis.  In  their  on-­‐going  project  with  China  Company  B  was  a   part   of   company   A   network   in   the   Chinese   project   and   was   therefore   also   an   interesting  company  to  examine.  Since  both  company  A  and  company  B  are  SMEs   the  author   found   it   interesting   to   identify  a   larger   firm,  active  within   the   same   industry   and   international   market,   enabling   comparisons.   Company   C   was   identified  in  association  with  the  project  of  “strategic  innovative  practices  global   alliances   in   the   Swedish   AEC   industry-­‐   preparing   for   opportunities”   performed   within   the  same  division  and  Centre   for  management  of   the  build  environment   (CMB).       3.5 Interview The  structure  of  the  interview  is  depending  on  the  purpose  of  the  interview  and   for   qualitative   research   the   interviews   are   normally   unstructured.   An   unstructured  interview  means  that  interviewee  may  just  have  one  question  that         CHALMERS  Civil and Environmental Engineering, Master’s Thesis 2015:72 19   the  respondent  need  to  respond  freely  on  and  the   interview  picks  up  on  things   that  seems  worth  to  follow  up  on.  A  semi-­‐structured  interview  guideline  for  the   interview  is  set  up,  does  not  necessarily  need  to  follow  the  same  structure  as  it  is   written  down,  and  it   is  usually  allows  an  open  answer  question.  If  needed,  new   questions   can   be   asked   during   the   interview   that   is   not   specified   in   advance.     Both  this  types  of  interviews  creates  flexibility.  They  are  also  considered  to  be  in-­‐ depth  interviews  (Bryman,  2008).     The   empirical   data   has   been   collected   through   six   interviews   with   project   managers   or   chief   executive   officer   at   three   different   companies.   The   interviewees   were   identified   through   contacts   with   CMB   and   the   on-­‐going   research   “strategic   innovative   practices   global   alliances   in   the   Swedish   AEC   industry-­‐   preparing   for   opportunities”   performed   by   Christian   Koch,   Martine   Buser  and  Petra  Bosch.  The  interview  was  conducted  in  association  with  Martine   Buser  and  was  mainly  held  in  English  language.     The   structure   of   the   interviews  was   as   previously  mentioned   semi-­‐structured.   That  enabled  the  respondent  to  elaborate,  and  if  needed  the  question  order  could   be   switched.   During   all   of   the   interviews,   notes   were   taken   and   it   was   also   complemented  with  recordings.  This  allows  the  author  to  go  back  and  evaluate   the   information   and   response   again,   making   sure   that   the   information   was   understood  correctly.  The  interview  was  performed  in  face-­‐to-­‐face  meetings;  the   interview   was   conducted   both   at   the   company   and   at   Chalmers   University   of   Technology.  The   interview  was  performed   in   the  time  period  of  November  and   December  of  2014  and  the  lasted  for  approximately  one  and  a  half  hour  each.     3.6 Data analysis As  Taylor-­‐Powell  &  Renner  (2003)  has identified in the report “analyzing qualitative data” an analys process for qualitative data this is done in five steps. Since the process is not fixed moving back and forwared between the steps can be made. The steps are (1) geting to knwo the data, (2) focusing the analysis, (3) categorize information, (4) identify patterns and connections wihthin and between categories and (5) interpretition. (1) Getting to know the data, this step means to go through the collected data over and over again to be able to provide a qualitative analysis, a deper understanding of the data enables a better analys. If the data were collected by interviews and they where recorded, it enables to listen to them over and over again , go throw notes etc. It is also important to sort out the relevant and relable information that has been discused (Taylor-­‐Powell  &  Renner,  2003). The data for this thesis was collected through interviews that was recorded, complemented with notes and a short summery after each interview was made to conclude the data. To gain a deper understanding of the data these information sources was examined over and over. (2) Focusing on the analysis. This is how the structure of the analysis is going to be put up. As a starting point it is important to know what to search for. Identify questions as guidlines in the process. It can also be narrowed down in to two approaches on how to respond to the analysis, with focus on the topic, event or time period it can also be with a focus on case, individuals or groups (Taylor-­‐Powell  &   Renner,  2003). CHALMERS,  Civil  and  Environmental  Engineering,  Master’s  Thesis  2015:72   20 (3) Categorize infromation, identify patterns that may occur in the data collected such as ideas, concepts, behavior or incidents. Try to organize the patterns that has been identified in to coherent categories (Taylor-­‐Powell  &  Renner,  2003). (4) Identify patterns and connection within and between categories, based on the caterorize information that has been developed in the stage above, trying to identify connections between them and evaluate the relationship between them (Taylor-­‐ Powell  &  Renner,  2003). (5) Interpretation, is the stage where all the information is being brought together. And based on the previous stages explan the findings and connection that has been identified (Taylor-­‐Powell  &  Renner,  2003).         CHALMERS  Civil and Environmental Engineering, Master’s Thesis 2015:72 21   4 Empirical data Data  presented  in  this  chapter  are  based  on  the  interviews  carried  out  with  three   different  companies,  where  a  total  of  six  interviews  were  made.  The  Interviews   were  made   within   the   construction   sector,   where   two   of   the   companies   were   small  to  medium  sized  enterprises  and  the  third  one,  a  large  company.  All  three   of   the   companies   are   currently  working   in   an   international   environment.  They   are   presented   with   letters   where   company   A   and   B   are   SMEs   and   the   third   company  C   is   a   larger   company.  All   three   of   these   companies   are   based   in   the   region   of   Gothenburg   and   perform   the   majority   of   their   projects   on   the   local   market   of   Gothenburg.   The   subjects   discussed   during   the   interviews   are:   how   their   international   contacts   are   set   up,   how   their   collaboration   look   like,  what   opportunities  they  see  within  the  international  market  and  lessons  learned  from   their  projects  abroad.  The  interviewees  are  presented  in  table  5,  below.     Interviewee   Company  A   Company  B   Company  C   A1   Former  CEO       A2   Project  Manager       A3   Initiative  taker       B1     Project  Manager     B2     CEO     C1       Project   Manager   Table 5 Formal positions and companies involved in this thesis 4.1 Company A Company  A  is  a  relative  small  company  with  its  base  in  Gothenburg.  Their  main   business   are   within   HVAC(explain)   and   they   are   a   traditional   company   that   usually  do  not  perform  job  outside  of  their  comfort  zone.  They  have  a  subsidiary   that   solely   are   focusing   on   new   inventions,   and   they   are   not   frightened   to   try   new   technology   or   try   new   markets.   This   is   the   main   driver   behind   their   international   process.   They   had   the   opportunity   to   get   in   contact   with   the   Chinese  market  and  they  took  it.  They  are  currently  part  of  an  association  with  a   few  other  companies  from  the  region  of  Gothenburg  that  performs  a  project  for  a   Chinese  company.     As   illustrated   in   table  5  above,   three  different   interviews  were   conducted  with   this   company;   all   of   them  were   somehow   involved   in   the  project   in  China.  The   interview   was   done   with   the   initiator   of   the   project,   A3,   the   former   chief   executive  officer,  A1,  and  the  project  manager,  A2,  that  currently  are  working  on   the  project.     4.1.1 How do they work international? It  was  mainly  the  subsidiary  of  company  A  that  started  the  internationalization   process,   prior   to   their   contact   with   China,   which   is   the   main   focus   of   the   interviews.   They   have   performed  projects   all   over   Sweden  but   also   in  Norway   and   Germany.   It   is   a   company   more   willing   to   take   risks,   but   they   also   have   employees  that  are  driven  and  can  be  seen  as  entrepreneurs.     Their  internationalization  process  started  with  a  school  that  they  had  projected   with  new  and  innovative  technology.  This   interested  an  architect   from  south  of   Sweden,  also  about  to  design  a  school.  The  architect  contacted  company  A  to  get   CHALMERS,  Civil  and  Environmental  Engineering,  Master’s  Thesis  2015:72   22 a  briefing  of  the  company  and  what  they  had  done  in  this  specific  school.  During   the   company   briefing   done   by   A3,   a   misunderstanding   occurred   when   the   locations   of   their   offices  were   presented.   One   of   the   offices   is   based   in   Kinna,   which   is   a   community   one   hour   drive   outside   of   Gothenburg.   The   architect   mistook  Kinna  for  China  (Kina,  in  Swedish)  and  asked  where  in  China  their  office   were  located.  It  turned  out  that  they  were  working  together  on  the  school  in  the   south   of   Sweden   and   they   got   to   know   each   other.   The   architect   had   business   over   in   China   and  where   about   to   travel   there   to   participate   in   an   exhibition.   Where   the   architect