Retail AI Roadmapping: A Data-Driven Portfolio Decision Engine
Hämtar...
Publicerad
Författare
Typ
Examensarbete för masterexamen
Master's Thesis
Master's Thesis
Modellbyggare
Tidskriftstitel
ISSN
Volymtitel
Utgivare
Sammanfattning
Retail companies face a growing number of possible AI initiatives, but the harder
problem is often not idea generation. It is deciding which use cases should be
prioritised, which ones fit the company context, and which ones are realistic to
move beyond experimentation. This thesis addresses that problem by developing a
structured decision-support framework for AI use-case prioritisation in retail, based
on an organisation × use-case representation that combines company-side attributes,
use-case-side attributes, and computed fit logic.
The empirical material comes from interviews with 33 Nordic retail companies across
Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Finland. The sample was weighted towards larger
retailers, with 16 companies in the SEK 1–10bn annual revenue range and 12 above
SEK 10bn, and included senior respondents such as CIOs, CTOs, CDOs, and heads of
data, technology, or AI. Across these interviews, respondents listed 151 AI use cases,
of which 55 were coded in greater depth with structured attributes and managerrated
impact assessment. The study combines descriptive portfolio analysis, baseline
impact modelling, model interpretability analysis, cluster-strength analysis, and
qualitative interpretation. The baseline impact models showed some predictive signal
in the structured interview attributes, especially for focused non-fit feature sets with
tree-based ensemble models. However, explanatory performance remained modest,
and predictions were compressed towards the middle of the impact scale. The models
should therefore be read as support for prioritisation rather than as precise impact
predictors.
The results suggest that AI use-case prioritisation in retail should not be reduced
either to GenAI adoption or to one universal ranking of use cases. GenAI adoption
was widespread, but traditional ML use cases often showed clearer operational
impact in the observed material. Data availability was generally stronger than data
quality and accessibility, while process-change burden appeared more prominent than
technical integration burden. In the observed-only cluster-strength results, internal
delivery, high data readiness, high change capacity, and forecasting or inventoryplanning
use cases appeared as recurring strong patterns, although these should be
interpreted as signals rather than general rules.
Overall, the thesis supports a context-sensitive playbook logic. Retailers should
prioritise AI use cases by asking where the operational pain is, whether the relevant
data is reliable and accessible, what portfolio role the use case should have, what
delivery route fits the context, and what operating model is needed after launch.
Beskrivning
Ämne/nyckelord
retail AI, AI use-case prioritisation, decision support, portfolio selection, machine learning.
