Fatigue life extension of welded steel structures by peening and TIG remelting

dc.contributor.authorAlkarawi, Hassan
dc.contributor.departmentChalmers tekniska högskola / Institutionen för arkitektur och samhällsbyggnadsteknik (ACE)sv
dc.contributor.examinerAl-Emrani, Mohammad
dc.contributor.supervisorManai, Asma
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-11T09:20:11Z
dc.date.available2022-10-11T09:20:11Z
dc.date.issued2019sv
dc.date.submitted2020
dc.description.abstractFatigue is one of the most detrimental phenomena that endangers the life expectancy of welded steel structures. weld is susceptible to fatigue more than other parts because of the high stress concentration, the existing weld defects and the residual stress induced by welding. If the structure is in service, the structure might be already cracked. Different techniques were developed to extend the fatigue life of the structure and retrofit any existing crack, Peening and TIG remelting are just examples. A literature study is conducted to establish better understand on the effect of these two treatment methods their efficiency in crack retrofitting. The crack retrofitting experiments consist of two stages, pre-fatigue loading and loading after treatment. The first stage requires crack detection, different methods were investigated and the most efficient among them is the use of local strain drop measured by strain gauges. Peening treatment is found to be a function of the crack depth. Retrofitting the crack when it’s still shallow results in longer fatigue life. The treatment is found to be mainly relying on two effects: the crack orientation and the introduced residual stress. Peening causes a change in crack orientation which elongate the fatigue life. The higher and deeper compressive residual stress causes retardation of crack growth and deceleration of crack propagation. TIG remelting is another effecitve method which can retrofit crack deeper than peening. Its efficiency is a function of the crack depth and the fusion depth. Usually, the fusion depth is greater than 2mm which is greater than the peening indentation depth which hardly can reach 0.6 mm. In short, TIG is more appropriate to retrofit cracks deeper than 1mm while Peening results in longer life if the largest crack is shallower than 1mm.sv
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12380/305706
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.setspec.uppsokTechnology
dc.subjectFatiguesv
dc.subjectweldingsv
dc.subjectPeeningsv
dc.subjectHFMIsv
dc.subjectTIG remeltingsv
dc.subjectTIG dressing,sv
dc.subjectLife extensionsv
dc.subjectPost weld treatmentsv
dc.subjectCrack retrofitingsv
dc.subjectCrack detectionsv
dc.subjectLinear elastic fracture mechanicssv
dc.subjectStrain gaugesv
dc.subjectfatigue crack,sv
dc.subjectLEFMsv
dc.subjectMicrohardnesssv
dc.subjectConcentration factorsv
dc.subjectGain factorsv
dc.titleFatigue life extension of welded steel structures by peening and TIG remeltingsv
dc.type.degreeExamensarbete på kandidatnivåsv
dc.type.uppsokM2

Ladda ner

Original bundle

Visar 1 - 1 av 1
Hämtar...
Bild (thumbnail)
Namn:
509578_Fulltext.pdf
Storlek:
1.38 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Beskrivning:
Report

License bundle

Visar 1 - 1 av 1
Hämtar...
Bild (thumbnail)
Namn:
license.txt
Storlek:
1.51 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Beskrivning: