Control Design for Differential Lock Synchronization in Heavy-Duty Trucks
| dc.contributor.author | Johansson, Hampus | |
| dc.contributor.author | Karlhager, Lukas | |
| dc.contributor.department | Chalmers tekniska högskola / Institutionen för elektroteknik | sv |
| dc.contributor.examiner | Fredriksson, Jonas | |
| dc.contributor.supervisor | Özkan, Basar | |
| dc.contributor.supervisor | Gelso, Esteban | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-09-25T13:36:35Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | |
| dc.date.submitted | ||
| dc.description.abstract | Heavy-duty trucks operating in low-traction environments rely on differential locks to maintain traction when a wheel spins out. These locks are commonly implemented with dog clutches, which require the connected shafts to be speed-matched before they can engage. Following a spin-out, achieving this match can force the driver to slow down or stop, wasting vehicle momentum and creating a safety risk on slopes. This thesis develops and compares active control strategies that synchronize the differential shafts after a wheel spin-out, enabling faster and safer dog clutch engagement. Individual wheel brakes and engine torque are used as actuators. A driveline model is derived for both the open and locked inter-axle differential configurations. A tire force estimator based on a Kalman filter provides feedforward disturbance cancellation, and a state transformation resolves an observability problem that arises when the inter-axle differential is locked. Three model-based controllers are designed and evaluated: a Linear-Quadratic Regulator (LQR), a Model Predictive Controller (MPC), and a Sliding Mode Controller (SMC). They are compared in simulation across split-friction and gravel road scenarios, using performance metrics for synchronization time, velocity loss, driver disturbance, and control effort, with tuning parameters swept to map the trade-offs between objectives. No significant trade-off is found between synchronization time and the remaining metrics: faster synchronization consistently coincides with lower velocity loss and does not worsen driver disturbance or control effort. A control strategy that follows the principles of the SMC is found to be best suited to the problem’s disturbance-heavy nature. Active engine torque control reduces velocity loss when traction allows, while on low-traction surfaces it must instead be limited to avoid excessive brake demand. | |
| dc.identifier.coursecode | EENX30 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12380/312558 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.setspec.uppsok | Technology | |
| dc.subject | differential lock | |
| dc.subject | dog clutch | |
| dc.subject | synchronization | |
| dc.subject | traction control | |
| dc.subject | heavyduty truck | |
| dc.subject | optimal control | |
| dc.subject | tire force estimation | |
| dc.subject | linear-quadratic regulator | |
| dc.subject | model predictive control | |
| dc.subject | sliding mode control | |
| dc.title | Control Design for Differential Lock Synchronization in Heavy-Duty Trucks | |
| dc.type.degree | Examensarbete för masterexamen | sv |
| dc.type.degree | Master's Thesis | en |
| dc.type.uppsok | H | |
| local.programme | Systems, control and mechatronics (MPSYS), MSc |
