Comparison of Predictive Gasoline Combustion Models Using GT-Power

dc.contributor.authorHebbur Rameshbabu, Aditya
dc.contributor.authorNagappa, Manjunath
dc.contributor.departmentChalmers tekniska högskola / Institutionen för tillämpad mekaniksv
dc.contributor.departmentChalmers University of Technology / Department of Applied Mechanicsen
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-03T14:52:28Z
dc.date.available2019-07-03T14:52:28Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractWith rising fuel prices and stringent emission regulations, OEMs are constantly working on improving the performance, fuel efficiency and reducing emissions of the internal combustion engines. Gas exchange simulation tools plays a very important role in the development of new concepts. Simulation tools helps to reduce the lead time significantly in developing new concepts. The engine performance is dependent on the combustion efficiency which is analysed through burn rate. But measuring burn rate during the combustion is a difficult task. One of the major tool developers Gamma Technologies have developed a predictive combustion model which predicts the burn rate using the cylinder pressure. Calibration of the models is important for obtaining reliable results. Volvo Car Corporation (VCC) use FKFS combustion model for the development of the gasoline engines. Using a different combustion system requires recalibration of the combustion model to develop new concepts. The aim of the thesis is to calibrate and validate the two predictive combustion models, SI Turb and FKFS in GT-Power and comparison of the models in order to assist future development of Gasoline engines at VCC. Predicting capabilities of the two calibrated combustion models is evaluated by its ability to predict the main operating parameters such as IMEP, Peak pressure, CA at 50% burn fraction and Ignition delay. Calibration of the model is done against the test data obtained from a single cylinder test rig and the data was validated for different errors before using it for calibration. The predicting capabilities for FKFS combustion model is good for the complete engine map, whereas SITurb combustion model predicts well only for the calibrated range.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12380/255898
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofseriesExamensarbete - Institutionen för tillämpad mekanik, Chalmers tekniska högskola : 2016:20
dc.setspec.uppsokTechnology
dc.subjectFarkostteknik
dc.subjectHållbar utveckling
dc.subjectEnergi
dc.subjectTransport
dc.subjectVehicle Engineering
dc.subjectSustainable Development
dc.subjectEnergy
dc.subjectTransport
dc.titleComparison of Predictive Gasoline Combustion Models Using GT-Power
dc.type.degreeExamensarbete för masterexamensv
dc.type.degreeMaster Thesisen
dc.type.uppsokH
local.programmeAutomotive engineering (MPAUT), MSc
Ladda ner
Original bundle
Visar 1 - 1 av 1
Bild (thumbnail)
Namn:
255898.pdf
Storlek:
4.99 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Beskrivning:
Fulltext