Life Cycle Assessment of Hydrogen Storage Systems for Trucks An assessment of environmental impacts and recycling flows of carbon fiber

dc.contributor.authorWeiszflog, Elsa
dc.contributor.authorAbbas, Manan
dc.contributor.departmentChalmers tekniska högskola / Institutionen för teknikens ekonomi och organisationsv
dc.contributor.examinerSandén, Björn
dc.contributor.supervisorNordelöf, Anders
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-21T12:30:03Z
dc.date.available2022-06-21T12:30:03Z
dc.date.issued2022sv
dc.date.submitted2022
dc.description.abstractThis thesis aims to extend the knowledge base regarding the life cycle environmental impacts of different hydrogen storage system (HSS) alternatives for fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEV). A Compressed Hydrogen (CH2) system was investigated and then used as the baseline for a comparison with a Liquid Hydrogen (LH2) storage system, and a Cryo-Compressed Hydrogen (CCH2) storage system. Further assessment was also made of the End-of-Life stage of CH2 system to capture how impacts alter if its most concerning material, Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP), is recycled. The study was conducted in collaboration with Volvo Group. As a result, two Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) case studies were conducted: one comparative of all HSSs; and one extended investigating aspects of CFRP recycling for the CH2 system. All HSS alternatives were modeled with a storage capacity of 80 kg of useable hydrogen. In both the studies, the life cycle processes were modeled in OpenLCA. The comparative LCA was modeled based on the cut- off approach, whereas the extended study credited recycling outputs back to the studied system. The LCIA results of the CH2 system show high production related impacts, predominantly caused by the carbon fiber production. For global warming it represents almost 57% of the total impact. However, recycling CFRP shows potential to significantly reduce this life cycle impact. When comparing the CH2 system to the LH2 and CCH2 systems, both latter cause higher impacts in three out of four impact categories. This is mainly due to the use phase emissions, specifically due to the high energy demand of liquefying hydrogen compared to compressing it. Still, for global warming, the CH2 system causes a slightly higher impact. Further research should be conducted for more detailed insights, especially regarding the utilization rate of the refueling infrastructure in the use phase. Due to the high impact of carbon fiber production, it is also proposed to evaluate a bio-based carbon fiber precursor input and study the life cycle impacts of long-term cyclic use of recycled carbon fibers.sv
dc.identifier.coursecodeTEKX08sv
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12380/304840
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.relation.ispartofseriesE2022_089sv
dc.setspec.uppsokTechnology
dc.subjecthydrogen storagesv
dc.subjectcompressed hydrogensv
dc.subjectliquid hydrogensv
dc.subjectcryo-compressed hydrogensv
dc.subjectcarbon fibersv
dc.subjectcarbon fiber reinforced polymersv
dc.subjectcircular economysv
dc.subjectlife cycle assessmentsv
dc.titleLife Cycle Assessment of Hydrogen Storage Systems for Trucks An assessment of environmental impacts and recycling flows of carbon fibersv
dc.type.degreeExamensarbete för masterexamensv
dc.type.uppsokH
local.programmeIndustrial ecology (MPTSE), MSc
Ladda ner
Original bundle
Visar 1 - 1 av 1
Hämtar...
Bild (thumbnail)
Namn:
E2022_089.pdf
Storlek:
3.1 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Beskrivning:
E2022_089
License bundle
Visar 1 - 1 av 1
Hämtar...
Bild (thumbnail)
Namn:
license.txt
Storlek:
1.51 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Beskrivning: