Comparative Design Analysis of Stainless-Steel Hollow Sections
Hämtar...
Publicerad
Författare
Typ
Examensarbete för masterexamen
Master's Thesis
Master's Thesis
Modellbyggare
Tidskriftstitel
ISSN
Volymtitel
Utgivare
Sammanfattning
Stainless steel hollow structural sections (HSS) are becoming increasingly popular in
modern construction due to their favourable design properties. However, differences
among international design standards can lead to variations in predicted member
capacities and structural efficiency. A comparative analysis of different design
approaches for stainless steel hollow sections based on four major structural standards:
AISC 370-21, ASCE 8-22, Eurocode 1993-1-4, and the second-generation Eurocode
(EN 1993-1-4:2025), was conducted to focus on how each standard addresses the
determination of the bending resistance, global slenderness, and local slenderness,
considering austenitic, ferritic, and duplex stainless-steel grades.
A literature review of the different design standards and baseline information about
stainless steel and its applications in structural engineering was first conducted and
then a design tool for a parametrized study was implemented. Different design
methods include the effective width method and direct strength method found in ASCE
8-22, effective width method from AISC 370-21 and Eurocode 1993 1-4, and the
continuous strength method in both AISC 370-21 and Eurocode 1993 1-4 generation 2.
Bending resistance calculations carried out across numerous sections of varying,
height, width, thickness, and steel grades were compared to the slenderness of each
section and the change in bending resistance for increasing slenderness is emphasized.
Strength enhancements due to cold worked stainless steel was investigated and noted
to play an important role in strength determinations when comparing standards. ASCE
and AISC design codes become much more comparable with these strength
enhancements factored in. The continuous strength method and direct strength method
are dependent on global slenderness and does not work for all size sections. The
comparison highlights the importance of knowing which method and standard is most
applicable to a given situation.
Overall methods found in AISC 370-21 showed higher resistances than ASCE 8-22 but
similar in results and methodology to both generations of EN1993 1-4.
Beskrivning
Ämne/nyckelord
Stainless Steel, Hollow sections, Comparative analysis, Bending resistance, American Society of Civil Engineers, American Institute of Steel Construction, Eurocode
