Exploration of Different Production Flow Setups in Manufacturing Facilities Evaluating Production Scenarios for SKFs Roller Production
| dc.contributor.author | Pettersson, Joel | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lorentzon, Max | |
| dc.contributor.department | Chalmers tekniska högskola / Institutionen för teknikens ekonomi och organisation | sv |
| dc.contributor.department | Chalmers University of Technology / Department of Technology Management and Economics | en |
| dc.contributor.examiner | Medbo, Per | |
| dc.contributor.supervisor | Medbo, Per | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-14T10:27:41Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-06-14T10:27:41Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
| dc.date.submitted | ||
| dc.description.abstract | This thesis investigates the optimization of production systems at SKF, a global leader in the manufacturing of bearings, focusing specifically on roller manufacturing in Gothenburg, Sweden. Given the rapid advancements in industrial manufacturing SKF seeks to increase the efficiency of their roller production. This study assesses two contrasting production scenarios, Simplified Flow and Flexible Flow, to determine which aligns best with SKF’s strategic objectives and the inherent challenges of the production environment. The primary aim is to evaluate these systems against key performance indicators, ultimately aiding SKF in refining its production processes. Research Questions (RQ): 1. What does the current situation look like for roller manufacturing at SKF? This question seeks to describe the baseline operations and existing challenges within SKF’s roller production. A VSM was conducted to answer RQ1. 2. What problem areas can be identified connected to the current situation? This focuses on pinpointing specific issues that could be addressed by changes in the production system. RQ2 was answered by identifying problem areas derived from interviews, observations, and the VSM where 6 problem areas were identified. 3. What are the main differences between the two proposed production scenarios and how do they manage the identified problem areas? This question compares the two production scenarios in detail, examining how each manages the identified problem areas. The Simplified Flow focuses on flow efficiency whilst Flexible Flow focuses on resource efficiency. 4. Which of the two proposed production scenarios for SRB rollers is most suitable for SKF? The final question aims to conclude which production scenario best fits the strategic and operational goals of SKF. RQ4, by combining the results from an MCDA analysis and how the respective scenario manages the identified problems, resulted in a recommendation to implement, and move toward the Simplified Flow along with aspects taken from the Flexible Flow. This research utilizes a mixed-method approach, incorporating both qualitative and quantitative data from interviews, observations, and internal documents. Through analysis framed by a literature review in production systems, this study contributes to the decision-making process at SKF and extends practical implications for the broader field of industrial manufacturing. | |
| dc.identifier.coursecode | TEKX08 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12380/307854 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.setspec.uppsok | Technology | |
| dc.subject | Production systems | |
| dc.subject | Production layout | |
| dc.subject | Material flow | |
| dc.subject | Value-stream mapping | |
| dc.subject | Performance objectives | |
| dc.subject | Key Performance Indicator (KPI) | |
| dc.subject | Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) | |
| dc.subject | Flow Efficiency | |
| dc.subject | Resource Efficiency | |
| dc.subject | Real Flexibility | |
| dc.title | Exploration of Different Production Flow Setups in Manufacturing Facilities Evaluating Production Scenarios for SKFs Roller Production | |
| dc.type.degree | Examensarbete för masterexamen | sv |
| dc.type.degree | Master's Thesis | en |
| dc.type.uppsok | H | |
| local.programme | Supply chain management (MPSCM), MSc |