Shared Charging Infrastructure in Collaborative Electrification Hubs (CEHs) Governance, Cost Allocation, and Operational Viability
| dc.contributor.author | Gebregziabher, Nahom Gebregiorgis | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pellicanò, Giuseppe | |
| dc.contributor.department | Chalmers tekniska högskola / Institutionen för teknikens ekonomi och organisation | sv |
| dc.contributor.department | Chalmers University of Technology / Department of Technology Management and Economics | en |
| dc.contributor.examiner | Dubois, Anna | |
| dc.contributor.supervisor | Dubois, Anna | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-06-04T07:29:30Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | |
| dc.date.submitted | ||
| dc.description.abstract | The European road freight sector is transitioning to battery electric vehicles due to stringent decarbonization mandates. However, this transition is hindered by severe physical constraints in the energy grid, rendering individual high-capacity charging connections unfeasible for many logistics service providers (LSPs). Consequently, the industry is gravitating towards Collaborative Electrification Hubs (CEHs). While CEHs resolve grid bottlenecks by aggregating demand, they introduce complex micro-level tensions regarding operational coordination, trust, and equitable cost allocation, particularly under volatile peak-based power tariffs. The central problem is the lack of established organizational models to govern these interdependent actors sharing a finite resource. This study employs a qualitative, multi-method approach to explore the organizational dynamics of shared charging infrastructure. The methodology integrates a Semi-systematic Literature Review (SSLR) focusing on logistics governance and electric vehicle infrastructure, complemented by semi-structured expert interviews with key stakeholders across academic, independent operational, and procurement domains. The analysis is grounded in a dual-theoretical framework: Resource Dependence Theory (RDT) explains the formation of hubs as bridging strategies to manage resource scarcity, while Game Theory assesses the strategic stability and fairness of cost-allocation mechanisms. The research proposes a "Three-Level Model of Systemic Interdependence" to illustrate how macro-level grid constraints force meso-level organizational clustering, which in turn generates micro-level operational friction. Preliminary findings suggest that without robust governance mechanisms and neutral orchestrators to enforce fair cost allocation and operational rules, CEHs are susceptible to free-riding and systemic instability. Ultimately, this thesis provides a theoretical and practical framework for designing governance structures that ensure fair access, mitigate operational uncertainty, and lower the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for logistics operators navigating the electrification transition. | |
| dc.identifier.coursecode | TEKX08 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12380/311116 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.setspec.uppsok | Technology | |
| dc.subject | Shared Charging Infrastructure | |
| dc.subject | Electric Freight Vehicles | |
| dc.subject | Logistics Governance | |
| dc.subject | Cost Allocation | |
| dc.title | Shared Charging Infrastructure in Collaborative Electrification Hubs (CEHs) Governance, Cost Allocation, and Operational Viability | |
| dc.type.degree | Examensarbete för masterexamen | sv |
| dc.type.degree | Master's Thesis | en |
| dc.type.uppsok | H | |
| local.programme | Supply chain management (MPSCM), MSc |
