Deep Dive into Sustainability Assessment Methods Cradle-to-Grave: Detriment or Benefit?
Publicerad
Författare
Typ
Examensarbete för masterexamen
Modellbyggare
Tidskriftstitel
ISSN
Volymtitel
Utgivare
Sammanfattning
The Construction Industry has been portrayed as a culprit in the global pursuit of sustainable
development due to the vast resources that the industry exploits and the chemicals and
pollutants it emits. It is commonly estimated that the construction industry utilizes about 30-
40% of the global natural resources. An important mitigator in the quest for a more
sustainable construction industry is Sustainability Assessment Methods (SAMs) or Green
Building Rating Systems.
SAMs were first introduced in the early 2000s and has since gained momentum worldwide. It
is now predicted to become a mainstream practice for large construction projects. Different
studies show that capital costs may increase short-term, compared to a ‘ordinary’ project.
However, certifying can lead to 6-30% in long-term capital savings. On the other hand, actors
in the industry sometimes perceive certain criteria or sustainability indicators (SIs) belonging
to SAMs to be ill-considered. Do these SIs still contribute toward sustainability, are they
beneficial or detrimental to the project?
This Master Thesis investigates three SAMs, BREEAM, LEED and Miljöbyggnad along with
the ecolabel Nordic Swan and service SundaHus. What are their sustainability indicators
grounded on? Are they aligned with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals
(SDGs) and does a certified building equal a sustainable one?
Two case studies are included in the Thesis. These investigate whether or not energy saving
measures from two different kinds of heat exchangers are more sustainable then procuring
only green power, such as BraMiljöval, in a specific real-life project. The case studies
evaluate the possible energy savings and what Global Warming Potential (GWP) they have
and compare which solution has the lowest GWP.
The conclusion is that certified buildings do not equal sustainable buildings, but it is likely
that the CO2 footprint of a certified building will be less than that of a non-certified. Since
SAMs are not adapted per project, in certain scenarios some SIs become a detriment rather
than a benefit, but in a larger sense are still beneficial. Additionally, SAMs do contribute
toward the UNs SDGs and Sweden’s Environmental Quality Goals
Beskrivning
Ämne/nyckelord
Sustainability, Sustainability Assessment Methods, Green Building Rating Systems, BREEAM, LEED, Miljöbyggnad, UNs sustainability goals