Containerized shipping via the northern sea route

dc.contributor.authorCitra, Rika
dc.contributor.authorAit, Mari-Liis
dc.contributor.departmentChalmers tekniska högskola / Institutionen för mekanik och maritima vetenskapersv
dc.contributor.examinerRingsberg, Henrik
dc.contributor.supervisorRingsberg, Henrik
dc.contributor.supervisorLi, Zhiyuan
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-10T15:25:01Z
dc.date.available2021-12-10T15:25:01Z
dc.date.issued2021sv
dc.date.submitted2020
dc.description.abstractClimate change has enabled Arctic shipping, specifically with the Northern Sea Route (NSR) that connects the Eastern part of Asia with Northern Europe. Providing a shorter distance from Northeast Asia to Northern Europe compared to the Suez Canal Route (SCR), the NSR could potentially become an alternative route to the SCR. The shorter distance additionally brings savings in time, fuel consumption and possibly other areas of costs. The study results showed that with the container vessel voyage via the NSR, there is a reduction of 25.1% in total distance, 25.8% or around 7.4 days in journey time and significant reduction can be seen in fuel consumption (44.2%) when comparing the same port pairs against the voyage via the SCR. However, the potential usage of the NSR for container liner shipping does not come without its own set of disadvantages and challenges. According to the interviews conducted for this study, difficult weather conditions were the most prominent disadvantage that caused doubts for the professionals from the shipping industry. That followed by the concern about the infrastructure along the coast of the NSR, administrative and political issues and extra demands or costs related to the vessel operations. Additionally, the commercial usage of the NSR could be stunted as many major shipping companies and customer goods owners have signed an environmental pledge, i.e., the Arctic Shipping Corporate Pledge. According to the pledge, the signatory parties commit to not use the NSR in their commercial activities because of the sensitivity of the Arctic region, the fragility of its ecosystems and habitat. Regarding different stakeholders, the port authority has expressed a positive attitude towards developing the NSR and making it feasible for commercial activity due to their potential future gains connected to their advantageous geographical location. However, other stakeholders have shown more doubt about the actual practicability and success of the NSR as an alternative route to the SCR.sv
dc.identifier.coursecodeMMSX30sv
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12380/304402
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.setspec.uppsokTechnology
dc.subjectNorthern Sea Route (the NSR)sv
dc.subjectArctic shippingsv
dc.subjectPolar Silk Roadsv
dc.subjectcontaineraized shippingsv
dc.subjectSuez Canal Route (the SCR)sv
dc.subjectadvantages of the NSRsv
dc.subjectdisadvantages of the NSRsv
dc.subjectMaritime managementsv
dc.titleContainerized shipping via the northern sea routesv
dc.type.degreeExamensarbete för masterexamensv
dc.type.uppsokH
local.programmeMaritime management (MPMAR), MSc
Ladda ner
Original bundle
Visar 1 - 1 av 1
Hämtar...
Bild (thumbnail)
Namn:
New_Final Report Master Thesis_Rika Citra Mari-Liis Ait HR271021.pdf
Storlek:
2.76 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Beskrivning:
License bundle
Visar 1 - 1 av 1
Hämtar...
Bild (thumbnail)
Namn:
license.txt
Storlek:
1.51 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Beskrivning: