Model predictive control of hydronic heating systems in buildings: Evaluation of energy performance, peak shaving and thermal comfort
Hämtar...
Publicerad
Författare
Typ
Examensarbete för masterexamen
Master's Thesis
Master's Thesis
Modellbyggare
Tidskriftstitel
ISSN
Volymtitel
Utgivare
Sammanfattning
With the increasing need for energy efficiency in the building sector, advanced control
strategies might prove to become essential for heating systems. This thesis investigates
the implementation and performance of utilizing model predictive control (MPC) to
optimize the hydronic heating system’s supply temperature in a high complexity, mod
ern office building. The evaluation focuses on energy performance, peak shaving and
thermal comfort.
To evaluate the control strategy, a reference building within the advanced building sim
ulation tool IDA ICE was utilized. Since the software does not support model predictive
control, a co-simulation was established between IDA ICE and Python. As a predictor
for the MPC, simplified resistance capacitance models representing the building zones
were constructed.
The simulations were conducted over a two-week period to optimize computational
efficiency and in March to evaluate the impact of solar gains. Initially, the results indi
cated energy savings of 20–30% when implementing the MPC comparedto atraditional
control system. However, after eliminating temperature discrepancies to ensure a cor
rect comparison, the actual savings related to the control logic were determined to be
3–5%. Regarding peak shaving, the analysis indicated a potential average reduction in
peak heating demand of 26% over a one-week period, while indoor thermal comfort
was successfully maintained within the defined boundaries of 21–25°C. Furthermore,
the robustness of the MPC was tested against forecast uncertainties in outdoor tempera
ture and occupancy. The results demonstrated that the closed-loop feedback effectively
compensated for prediction errors and maintained thermal comfort.
Multiple sources of error and limitations were identified. For instance, the results of the
shortened two-week simulation period may not apply for other periods of the heating
season. Additionally, focusing solely on March presents an idealized scenario since
the conditions in March are typically favorable for an MPC due to moderate heating
demands and significant solar gains. Nonetheless, the results clearly demonstrate the
potential of implementing MPC. While further testing on a physical building is required
to validate these findings, MPC offers a viable path forward for enhancing energy effi
ciency in modern buildings.
Beskrivning
Ämne/nyckelord
Model predictive control (MPC), Co-simulation, IDA ICE, Resistance ca pacitance (RC), Peak shaving, Thermal comfort, Energy efficiency
