Managing Sustainable Nitrogen Removal from Wastewater Carbon Sources for Denitrification

dc.contributor.authorSJÖSTEDT, SOFIA
dc.contributor.authorKJELLÉN, LINNEA
dc.contributor.departmentChalmers tekniska högskola / Institutionen för arkitektur och samhällsbyggnadsteknik (ACE)sv
dc.contributor.departmentChalmers tekniska högskola / Institutionen för arkitektur och samhällsbyggnadsteknik (ACE)en
dc.contributor.examinerWilén, Britt-Marie
dc.contributor.supervisorPersson, Frank
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-11T10:50:53Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.date.submitted
dc.description.abstractExternal carbon sources are essential for effective nitrogen removal in biological post denitrification at wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). However, the commonly used fossil-based methanol contributes significantly to the climate impact of WWTPs. This study examined both technical and sustainability aspects of transitioning to more sustainable carbon sources, focusing on methanol and ethanol. Denitrification performance during carbon source transitions was evaluated in laboratory-scale moving bed biofilm reactors (MBBRs), designed to replicate full-scale conditions. Methanol, ethanol, and a methanol/ethanol mixture were tested in a system acclimated to methanol. Results showed comparable performance between the mixture and methanol alone. No major differences were observed when switching from methanol to ethanol. Switching back to methanol resulted in a temporary decrease in performance, suggesting a short acclimation period may be needed. In parallel, a sustainability assessment using a multi-criteria analysis framework was conducted to develop a basis for future evaluation of fossil-free methanol and ethanol alternatives. Relevant options and criteria across ecological, social, and economic dimensions were defined, and both qualitative and quantitative data were collected. Based on the findings, three of the 11 criteria are considered ready for direct application in future assessments. One criterion was excluded due to a confirmed lack of impact, while the remaining seven require additional data or further investigation. All alternatives are recommended for continued evaluation, except recycled ethanol, which requires further testing due to uncertainties related to impurities.
dc.identifier.coursecodeACEX30
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12380/310468
dc.language.isoeng
dc.setspec.uppsokTechnology
dc.subjectwastewater treatment
dc.subjectmulti-criteria analysis
dc.subjectexternal carbon source
dc.subjectmoving bed biofilm reactor
dc.subjectdenitrification
dc.subjectnitrogen removal
dc.titleManaging Sustainable Nitrogen Removal from Wastewater Carbon Sources for Denitrification
dc.type.degreeExamensarbete för masterexamensv
dc.type.degreeMaster's Thesisen
dc.type.uppsokH
local.programmeInfrastructure and environmental engineering (MPIEE), MSc
local.programmeIndustrial ecology (MPTSE), MSc

Ladda ner

Original bundle

Visar 1 - 1 av 1
Hämtar...
Bild (thumbnail)
Namn:
ACEX30 - Linnea Kjellén and Sofia Sjöstedt.pdf
Storlek:
2.08 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Visar 1 - 1 av 1
Hämtar...
Bild (thumbnail)
Namn:
license.txt
Storlek:
2.35 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Beskrivning: